Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2016;19(1):35-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2016.01.008.

Subfascial drainage for management of cerebrospinal fluid leakage after posterior spine surgeryd---A prospective study based on Poiseuille's law

Zhao Fang  1 , Yu-Tao Jia, Rong Tian, Yang Liu
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Subfascial drainage for management of cerebrospinal fluid leakage after posterior spine surgeryd---A prospective study based on Poiseuille's law

Zhao Fang et al. Chin J Traumatol. 2016.

Abstract

Purpose: Up to date, some approaches retarding the flow of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) could be regarded as direct applications of the fluid mechanics (Poiseuille's law). However, there is a lack of the research on the efficacy of subfascial drainage for management of CSF leak after spine surgery based on the law. This is a prospective and comparative study on subfascial drainage for CSF.

Methods: Every four months in the three years from January 2010 to December 2012, the patients were enrolled respectively in Group A, Group B and Group C, in which, the drainage tube was discontinued within postoperative 3-4 days, 5-6 days, 7-10 days. Results and complications of postoperative CSF leak were investigated, and mean wound healing time (MWHT) of the three groups was compared.

Results: A total of 108 cases (Group A/B/C:35/32/41) of CSF leak following posterior spine surgery were admitted to Tianjin Union Medicine Center, and 92 cases have been followed up for more than 1 year (follow-up rate of 85.2%). Preoperative demographics were similar among the 3 groups. In Group A, 7 patients developed CSF leak through the wound (CSFLW), of which 5 cases had to undergo reoperation. One case in Group A was confirmed to have pseudomeningocele at the 1st month after surgery. The MWHT was (16.6±3.6) days. In Group B, 3 patients developed CSFLWand cured by reoperation, in which 1 case of superficial infection recovered well after reoperation. MWHT was (11.4±2.2) days. In Group C, CSFLWwas not found and MWHT was (10.1±2.9) days. The differences of MWHT among Groups A, B and C were statistically significant.

Conclusion: Postoperative subfascial drainage, which is used to decrease the subfascial space pressure (P₂), would help wound healing. When it is placed for more than 7 days, the wound resistance (Rw) would be strong enough to withstand the subarachnoid pressure (P₁). Meanwhile, the power trans- duction in a sequence of Rw > P₂ > P₁ will indirectly retard CSF leak at the durotomy site and accordingly facilitate the healing of damaged spinal dura mater.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The formula of Poiseuille's law.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Physical concepts in CSF flow.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Baker G.A., Cizik A.M., Bransford R.J. Risk factors for unintended durotomy during spine surgery: a multivariate analysis. Spine J. 2012;12:121–126. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lotfinia I., Sayyahmelli S. Incidental durotomy during lumbar spine surgery. Neurosurgery. 2012;22:105–112.
    1. Sirs J.A. The flow of human blood through capillary tubes. J Physiol. 1991;442:569–583. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Srivastava A., Sood A., Joy S.P. Principles of physics in surgery: the laws of flow dynamics physics for surgeons – Part 1. Indian J Surg. 2009;71:182–187. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cho J.Y., Chan C.K., Lee S.H. Management of cerebrospinal fluid leakage after anterior decompression for ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament in the thoracic spine: the utilization of a volume-controlled pseudomeningocele. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012;25:E93–E102. - PubMed

Publication types