Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr 1;11(4):e0151209.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151209. eCollection 2016.

Infections on Temporal Networks--A Matrix-Based Approach

Affiliations

Infections on Temporal Networks--A Matrix-Based Approach

Andreas Koher et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

We extend the concept of accessibility in temporal networks to model infections with a finite infectious period such as the susceptible-infected-recovered (SIR) model. This approach is entirely based on elementary matrix operations and unifies the disease and network dynamics within one algebraic framework. We demonstrate the potential of this formalism for three examples of networks with high temporal resolution: networks of social contacts, sexual contacts, and livestock-trade. Our investigations provide a new methodological framework that can be used, for instance, to estimate the epidemic threshold, a quantity that determines disease parameters, for which a large-scale outbreak can be expected.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Transitivity is not assured in temporal networks.
Here, links 1 → 2 and 2 → 3 exist, but the temporal order (1 → 2 at time t = 1 and 2 → 3 at time t = 0) prevents information to spread from node 1 to 3.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Prevalence, incidence and cumulative incidence for the social contacts network.
(A) Comparison between the individual single source outbreaks (blue, right axes) and the corresponding, averaged prevalence (black, left axes). The infectious period is fixed at τ = 20h. The arrow at t = 14.8h indicates the maximum averaged prevalence. (B) Mean prevalence ρ(It) (solid curves), incidence ρ(Jt) (blue bars, right scale) and cumulative incidence ρ(Ct) (dashed curves). Here, the arrow points at the maximum averaged incidence (t = 1.8h).
Fig 3
Fig 3. Prevalence, incidence and cumulative incidence for the sexual contacts network.
(A) Comparison between the individual single source outbreaks (blue, right axes) and the corresponding, averaged prevalence (black, left axes). The infectious period is fixed at τ = 91 d. The arrow indicates the maximum averaged prevalence. (B) Mean prevalence ρ(It) (solid curves), incidence ρ(Jt) (blue bars, right scale) and cumulative incidence ρ(Ct) (dashed curves). Here, the arrow points at the maximum averaged incidence.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Prevalence, incidence and cumulative incidence for the livestock-trade network.
(A) Comparison between the individual single source outbreaks (blue, right axes) and the corresponding, averaged prevalence (black, left axes). The infectious period is fixed at τ = 14 d. The arrow indicates the maximum averaged prevalence. (B) Mean prevalence ρ(It) (solid curves), incidence ρ(Jt) (blue bars, right scale) and cumulative incidence ρ(Ct) (dashed curves). Here, the arrow points at the maximum averaged incidence.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Estimating the critical infectious period for the social (A), the sexual (B) and the livestock-trade network (C).
Fraction of nodes, which have been infected up to the observation time as a function of the infectious period τ. The grey line is a linear regression through the last 6 data points and the zero crossing gives a rough estimate of the critical infectious period τc. We found τc = 1.20 ± 0.05 hours, τc = 48 ± 2 days and τc = 10.8 ± 0.3 days for the social, the sexual and the livestock-trade network, respectively. The uncertainties are calculated from the least-squares fit.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Broder A, Kumar R, Maghoul F, Raghavan P, Rajagopalan S, Stata R, et al. Graph structure in the web. Computer networks. 2000;33(1):309–320. 10.1016/S1389-1286(00)00083-9 - DOI
    1. Barabasi AL, Jeong H, Néda Z, Ravasz E, Schubert A, Vicsek T. Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A. 2002;311(3–4):590–614. 10.1016/S0378-4371(02)00736-7 - DOI
    1. Jeong H, Mason SP, Barabasi AL, Oltvai ZN. Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature. 2001;411(6833):41–42. 10.1038/35075138 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Colizza V, Pastor-Satorras R, Vespignani A. Reaction-diffusion processes and metapopulation models in heterogeneous networks. Nature Phys. 2007;3:276.
    1. Van den Broeck W, Gioannini C, Goncalves B, Quaggiotto M, Colizza V, Vespignani A. The GLEaMviz computational tool, a publicly available software to explore realistic epidemic spreading scenarios at the global scale. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2011;11(1):37 10.1186/1471-2334-11-37 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types