Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr 1:16:292.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2962-8.

The effects of maximising the UK's tobacco control score on inequalities in smoking prevalence and premature coronary heart disease mortality: a modelling study

Affiliations

The effects of maximising the UK's tobacco control score on inequalities in smoking prevalence and premature coronary heart disease mortality: a modelling study

Kirk Allen et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Smoking is more than twice as common among the most disadvantaged socioeconomic groups in England compared to the most affluent and is a major contributor to health-related inequalities. The United Kingdom (UK) has comprehensive smoking policies in place: regular tax increases; public information campaigns; on-pack pictorial health warnings; advertising bans; cessation; and smoke-free areas. This is confirmed from its high Tobacco Control Scale (TCS) score, an expert-developed instrument for assessing the strength of tobacco control policies. However, room remains for improvement in tobacco control policies. Our aim was to evaluate the cumulative effect on smoking prevalence of improving all TCS components in England, stratified by socioeconomic circumstance.

Methods: Effect sizes and socioeconomic gradients for all six types of smoking policy in the UK setting were adapted from systematic reviews, or if not available, from primary studies. We used the IMPACT Policy Model to link predicted changes in smoking prevalence to changes in premature coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality for ages 35-74. Health outcomes with a time horizon of 2025 were stratified by quintiles of socioeconomic circumstance.

Results: The model estimated that improving all smoking policies to achieve a maximum score on the TCS might reduce smoking prevalence in England by 3% (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1-4%), from 20 to 17% in absolute terms, or by 15% in relative terms (95% CI: 7-21%). The most deprived quintile would benefit more, with absolute reductions from 31 to 25%, or a 6% reduction (95% CI: 2-7%). There would be some 3300 (95% CI: 2200-4700) fewer premature CHD deaths between 2015-2025, a 2% (95% CI: 1.4-2.9%) reduction. The most disadvantaged quintile would benefit more, reducing absolute inequality of CHD mortality by about 4 % (95% CI: 3-9%).

Conclusions: Further, feasible improvements in tobacco control policy could substantially improve population health, and reduce health-related inequalities in England.

Keywords: Coronary heart disease; Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC); Socioeconomic inequalities; Tobacco control.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Observed vs. estimated smoking prevalence after maximising the Tobacco Control Scale. Stratified by quintiles of Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMDQ), for ages 35–74, England. Average smoking prevalence for IMDQ is a weighted average across ages 35–74 using the European Standard. These weighted averages for men and women are themselves averaged at the IMDQ level. Error bars are 95 % confidence intervals based on probabilistic sensitivity analysis

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Opinions and lifestyle survey, adult smoking habits in Great Britain, 2013. [http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/ghs/opinions-and-lifestyle-survey/adult-sm...]. Accessed 03 Aug 2015.
    1. Statistics on smoking: England 2014 [http://www.hscic.gov.uk/catalogue/PUB14988].Accessed 03 Aug 2015.
    1. Hiscock R, Bauld L, Amos A, Platt S. Smoking and socioeconomic status in England: the rise of the never smoker and the disadvantaged smoker. J Public Health Oxf Engl. 2012;34:390–396. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fds012. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Giesinger I, Goldblatt P, Howden-Chapman P, Marmot M, Kuh D, Brunner E. Association of socioeconomic position with smoking and mortality: the contribution of early life circumstances in the 1946 birth cohort. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014;68:275–279. doi: 10.1136/jech-2013-203159. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Action on Smoking and Health (ASH) Smoking statistics: illness and death. London: ASH; 2014.

Publication types