Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 May;26(5):373-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.02.009. Epub 2016 Mar 8.

Characterization of the gut microbiome in epidemiologic studies: the multiethnic cohort experience

Affiliations
Review

Characterization of the gut microbiome in epidemiologic studies: the multiethnic cohort experience

Benjamin C Fu et al. Ann Epidemiol. 2016 May.

Abstract

Purpose: The development of next-generation sequencing and accompanying bioinformatics tools has revolutionized characterization of microbial communities. As interest grows in the role of the human microbiome in health and disease, so does the need for well-powered, robustly designed epidemiologic studies. Here, we discuss sources of bias that can arise in gut microbiome research.

Methods: Research comparing methods of specimen collection, preservation, processing, and analysis of gut microbiome samples is reviewed. Although selected studies are primarily based on the gut, many of the same principles are applicable to samples derived from other anatomical sites. Methods for participant recruitment and sampling of the gut microbiome implemented in an ongoing population-based study, the Multiethnic Cohort (MEC), are also described.

Results: Variation in methodologies can influence the results of human microbiome studies. To help minimize bias, techniques such as sample homogenization, addition of internal standards, and quality filtering should be adopted in protocols. Within the MEC, participant response rates to stool sample collection were comparable to other studies, and in-home stool sample collection yields sufficient high-quality DNA for gut microbiome analysis.

Conclusions: Application of standardized and quality controlled methods in human microbiome studies is necessary to ensure data quality and comparability among studies.

Keywords: Gut bacteria; Microbiome; Multiethnic Cohort; Stool.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Huttenhower C, Gevers D, Knight R, Abubucker S, Badger JH, et al. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature. 2012;486:207–214. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Li J, Jia H, Cai X, Zhong H, Feng Q, et al. An integrated catalog of reference genes in the human gut microbiome. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32:834–841. - PubMed
    1. Wang WL, Xu SY, Ren ZG, Tao L, Jiang JW, et al. Application of metagenomics in the human gut microbiome. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:803–814. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gillevet P, Sikaroodi M, Keshavarzian A, Mutlu EA. Quantitative assessment of the human gut microbiome using multitag pyrosequencing. Chem Biodivers. 2010;7:1065–1075. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zoetendal EG, von Wright A, Vilpponen-Salmela T, Ben-Amor K, Akkermans AD, et al. Mucosa-associated bacteria in the human gastrointestinal tract are uniformly distributed along the colon and differ from the community recovered from feces. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68:3401–3407. - PMC - PubMed