Impact of Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Testing for Respiratory Pathogens on Healthcare Resource Utilization for Pediatric Inpatients
- PMID: 27039227
- PMCID: PMC5452417
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.02.050
Impact of Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Testing for Respiratory Pathogens on Healthcare Resource Utilization for Pediatric Inpatients
Abstract
Objective: To assess whether multiplex polymerase chain reaction (mPCR) vs non-mPCR testing impacts the use of antibiotics, chest radiographs, and isolation precautions.
Study design: We retrospectively compared use of antibiotics, chest radiographs, and isolation precautions for patients <18 years old (excluding neonates) hospitalized at a tertiary referral center tested for respiratory pathogens in the emergency department or during the first 2 hospital days, during 2 periods: June 2010-June 2012 (non-mPCR group) vs October 2012-May 2014 (mPCR group).
Results: Subjects (n = 2430) in the mPCR group were older, had more complex chronic conditions, and were admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit more often compared with the non-mPCR (n = 2349) group. Subjects in the mPCR group had more positive tests (42.4% vs 14.4%, P < .01), received fewer days of antibiotics (4 vs 5 median antibiotic days, P < .01), fewer chest radiographs performed, (59% vs 78%, P < .01), and were placed in isolation longer (20 vs 0 median isolation-hours, P < .01) compared with the non-mPCR group. In multivariable regression, patients tested with mPCR were less likely to receive antibiotics for ≥2 days (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.5-0.6), chest radiographs at admission (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.3-0.4), and more likely to be in isolation for ≥2 days (OR 2.4, 95% CI 2.1-2.8) compared with the non-mPCR group.
Conclusions: Use of mPCR testing for respiratory viruses among hospitalized patients was significantly associated with decreased healthcare resource utilization, including decreased use of antibiotics and chest radiographs, and increased use of isolation precautions.
Keywords: Health resources; Respiratory pathogen testing; Respiratory viral panel.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
Comment in
-
Reply.J Pediatr. 2016 Dec;179:275. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.07.051. Epub 2016 Aug 22. J Pediatr. 2016. PMID: 27562919 No abstract available.
-
Multiplex polymerase chain reaction testing in pediatric inpatients with febrile seizures.J Pediatr. 2016 Dec;179:274-275. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.07.047. Epub 2016 Aug 23. J Pediatr. 2016. PMID: 27562920 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Viral PCR testing associated with decreased healthcare resource utilization.J Pediatr. 2016 Nov;178:305. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.08.071. J Pediatr. 2016. PMID: 27788843 No abstract available.
References
-
- Wishaupt J.O., Russcher A., Smeets L.C., Versteegh F.G.A., Hartwig N.G. Clinical impact of RT-PCR for pediatric acute respiratory infections: a controlled clinical trial. Pediatrics. 2011;128:e1113–e1120. - PubMed
-
- Wang J., Simons D.B., Adams J.L., Jerris R.C., Rogers B.B. Multiplex viral polymerase chain reaction testing using the FilmArray device compared with direct fluorescent antibody testing. Lab Med. 2014;45:62–64. - PubMed
-
- Rogers B.B., Shankar P., Jerris R.C., Kotzbauer D., Anderson E.J., Watson J.R. Impact of a rapid respiratory panel test on patient outcomes. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2015;139:636–641. - PubMed
-
- Robinson C.C. The value of RVP in children's hospitals. J Clin Virol. 2007;40(Suppl 1):S51–S52. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources