Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jun:173:196-201.e2.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.02.050. Epub 2016 Mar 30.

Impact of Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Testing for Respiratory Pathogens on Healthcare Resource Utilization for Pediatric Inpatients

Affiliations

Impact of Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Testing for Respiratory Pathogens on Healthcare Resource Utilization for Pediatric Inpatients

Anupama Subramony et al. J Pediatr. 2016 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To assess whether multiplex polymerase chain reaction (mPCR) vs non-mPCR testing impacts the use of antibiotics, chest radiographs, and isolation precautions.

Study design: We retrospectively compared use of antibiotics, chest radiographs, and isolation precautions for patients <18 years old (excluding neonates) hospitalized at a tertiary referral center tested for respiratory pathogens in the emergency department or during the first 2 hospital days, during 2 periods: June 2010-June 2012 (non-mPCR group) vs October 2012-May 2014 (mPCR group).

Results: Subjects (n = 2430) in the mPCR group were older, had more complex chronic conditions, and were admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit more often compared with the non-mPCR (n = 2349) group. Subjects in the mPCR group had more positive tests (42.4% vs 14.4%, P < .01), received fewer days of antibiotics (4 vs 5 median antibiotic days, P < .01), fewer chest radiographs performed, (59% vs 78%, P < .01), and were placed in isolation longer (20 vs 0 median isolation-hours, P < .01) compared with the non-mPCR group. In multivariable regression, patients tested with mPCR were less likely to receive antibiotics for ≥2 days (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.5-0.6), chest radiographs at admission (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.3-0.4), and more likely to be in isolation for ≥2 days (OR 2.4, 95% CI 2.1-2.8) compared with the non-mPCR group.

Conclusions: Use of mPCR testing for respiratory viruses among hospitalized patients was significantly associated with decreased healthcare resource utilization, including decreased use of antibiotics and chest radiographs, and increased use of isolation precautions.

Keywords: Health resources; Respiratory pathogen testing; Respiratory viral panel.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study population. NICU, neonatal intensive care unit.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of respiratory pathogen testing results comparing non-mPCR and mPCR testing groups.

Comment in

References

    1. Wishaupt J.O., Versteegh F.G.A., Hartwig N.G. PCR testing for paediatric acute respiratory tract infections. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2015;16:43–48. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wishaupt J.O., Russcher A., Smeets L.C., Versteegh F.G.A., Hartwig N.G. Clinical impact of RT-PCR for pediatric acute respiratory infections: a controlled clinical trial. Pediatrics. 2011;128:e1113–e1120. - PubMed
    1. Wang J., Simons D.B., Adams J.L., Jerris R.C., Rogers B.B. Multiplex viral polymerase chain reaction testing using the FilmArray device compared with direct fluorescent antibody testing. Lab Med. 2014;45:62–64. - PubMed
    1. Rogers B.B., Shankar P., Jerris R.C., Kotzbauer D., Anderson E.J., Watson J.R. Impact of a rapid respiratory panel test on patient outcomes. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2015;139:636–641. - PubMed
    1. Robinson C.C. The value of RVP in children's hospitals. J Clin Virol. 2007;40(Suppl 1):S51–S52. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances