Biomechanical Comparison of All-Suture Anchor Fixation and Interference Screw Technique for Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis
- PMID: 27039966
- DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.01.016
Biomechanical Comparison of All-Suture Anchor Fixation and Interference Screw Technique for Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the biomechanical characteristics of the subpectoral Y-knot all-suture anchor fixation with those of the interference screw technique.
Methods: Sixteen fresh-frozen human cadaveric shoulders with a mean age of 67.6 ± 5.8 years (range, 52 to 74 years) were studied. The specimens were randomly grouped into 2 experimental biceps tenodesis groups (n = 8): Y-knot all-suture anchor or interference screw. The specimens were cyclically tested to failure by applying tensile forces parallel to the longitudinal axis of the humerus. A preload of 5 N was applied for 2 minutes prior to cyclic loading for 500 cycles from 5 to 70 N at 1 Hz; subsequently, a load-to-failure test at 1 mm/s was performed. The ultimate failure load, stiffness, displacement at cyclic and failure loading, and mode of failure were recorded.
Results: The all-suture anchor technique displayed values of ultimate failure load and stiffness comparable to that of the interference screw technique. The displacement at cyclic and failure loading of the all-suture anchor trials were significantly greater than the interference screw (P = .0002). The all-suture anchor specimens experienced anchor pullout and tendon tear equally during the trials, whereas the interference screw group experienced tendon tear in most of the cases and screw pullout in 2 trials.
Conclusions: The Y-knot all-suture anchor fixation provides equivalent ultimate failure load and stiffness when compared with the interference screw technique in tenodesis of the proximal biceps tendon from a subpectoral approach. However, the interference screw technique demonstrates significantly less displacement in response to cyclic and failure loading.
Clinical relevance: The all-suture anchor fixation is an alternative technique for subpectoral biceps tenodesis even at greater displacement when compared with the interference screw fixation during cyclic and failure loading.
Copyright © 2016 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Biomechanical Evaluation of a Transtendinous All-Suture Anchor Technique Versus Interference Screw Technique for Suprapectoral Biceps Tenodesis in a Cadaveric Model.Arthroscopy. 2018 Jun;34(6):1755-1761. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.01.007. Epub 2018 Feb 23. Arthroscopy. 2018. PMID: 29482858
-
Biomechanical evaluation of subpectoral biceps tenodesis: dual suture anchor versus interference screw fixation.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Oct;22(10):1408-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.12.039. Epub 2013 Feb 15. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013. PMID: 23415819
-
Biomechanical comparison of intramedullary cortical button fixation and interference screw technique for subpectoral biceps tenodesis.Arthroscopy. 2013 May;29(5):845-53. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.01.010. Epub 2013 Mar 7. Arthroscopy. 2013. PMID: 23587927
-
Are Implant Choice and Surgical Approach Associated With Biceps Tenodesis Construct Strength? A Systematic Review and Meta-regression.Am J Sports Med. 2020 Apr;48(5):1273-1280. doi: 10.1177/0363546519876107. Epub 2019 Oct 4. Am J Sports Med. 2020. PMID: 31585053
-
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Biceps Tenodesis Fixation Strengths: Fixation Type and Location Are Biomechanically Equivalent.Arthroscopy. 2020 Dec;36(12):3081-3091. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.05.055. Epub 2020 Jun 30. Arthroscopy. 2020. PMID: 32619605
Cited by
-
Clinical Outcomes of an All-Arthroscopic Biceps Tenodesis Using the Anterolateral Anchor During Concomitant Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair.Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Oct 9;8(10):2325967120959142. doi: 10.1177/2325967120959142. eCollection 2020 Oct. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020. PMID: 33102609 Free PMC article.
-
All-suture anchor size and drill angle influence load to failure in a porcine model of subpectoral biceps tenodesis, a biomechanical study.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 May 23;25(1):408. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07503-0. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024. PMID: 38783272 Free PMC article.
-
Arthroscopic Biceps Tenodesis Using Interference Screw Fixation in the Bicipital Groove.Arthrosc Tech. 2017 Oct 23;6(5):e1953-e1957. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2017.07.025. eCollection 2017 Oct. Arthrosc Tech. 2017. PMID: 29430396 Free PMC article.
-
All Suture Biceps Tenodesis Has Greater Biomechanical Strength Than Metal Button Fixation.Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024 Jul 8;6(6):100966. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100966. eCollection 2024 Dec. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024. PMID: 39776499 Free PMC article.
-
Anatomic reconstruction using the autologous gracilis tendon achieved less sprain recurrence than the Broström-Gould procedure but delayed recovery in chronic lateral ankle instability.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Dec;30(12):4181-4188. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07011-5. Epub 2022 Jun 8. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022. PMID: 35674772
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources