Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2016 Apr 4;4(4):CD011391.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011391.pub2.

Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer

Deniece Riviere et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Surgical resection is currently the only treatment with the potential for long-term survival and cure of pancreatic cancer. Surgical resection is provided as distal pancreatectomy for cancers of the body and tail of the pancreas. It can be performed by laparoscopic or open surgery. In operations on other organs, laparoscopic surgery has been shown to reduce complications and length of hospital stay as compared with open surgery. However, concerns remain about the safety of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy compared with open distal pancreatectomy in terms of postoperative complications and oncological clearance.

Objectives: To assess the benefits and harms of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy versus open distal pancreatectomy for people undergoing distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the body or tail of the pancreas, or both.

Search methods: We used search strategies to search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded and trials registers until June 2015 to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised studies. We also searched the reference lists of included trials to identify additional studies.

Selection criteria: We considered for inclusion in the review RCTs and non-randomised studies comparing laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer, irrespective of language, blinding or publication status..

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently identified trials and independently extracted data. We calculated odds ratios (ORs), mean differences (MDs) or hazard ratios (HRs) along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using both fixed-effect and random-effects models with RevMan 5 on the basis of intention-to-treat analysis when possible.

Main results: We found no RCTs on this topic. We included in this review 12 non-randomised studies that compared laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy (1576 participants: 394 underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and 1182 underwent open distal pancreatectomy); 11 studies (1506 participants: 353 undergoing laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and 1153 undergoing open distal pancreatectomy) provided information for one or more outcomes. All of these studies were retrospective cohort-like studies or case-control studies. Most were at unclear or high risk of bias, and the overall quality of evidence was very low for all reported outcomes.Differences in short-term mortality (laparoscopic group: 1/329 (adjusted proportion based on meta-analysis estimate: 0.5%) vs open group: 11/1122 (1%); OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.11 to 2.17; 1451 participants; nine studies; I(2) = 0%), long-term mortality (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.12; 277 participants; three studies; I(2) = 0%), proportion of people with serious adverse events (laparoscopic group: 7/89 (adjusted proportion: 8.8%) vs open group: 6/117 (5.1%); OR 1.79, 95% CI 0.53 to 6.06; 206 participants; three studies; I(2) = 0%), proportion of people with a clinically significant pancreatic fistula (laparoscopic group: 9/109 (adjusted proportion: 7.7%) vs open group: 9/137 (6.6%); OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.47 to 3.02; 246 participants; four studies; I(2) = 61%) were imprecise. Differences in recurrence at maximal follow-up (laparoscopic group: 37/81 (adjusted proportion based on meta-analysis estimate: 36.3%) vs open group: 59/103 (49.5%); OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.05; 184 participants; two studies; I(2) = 13%), adverse events of any severity (laparoscopic group: 33/109 (adjusted proportion: 31.7%) vs open group: 45/137 (32.8%); OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.66; 246 participants; four studies; I(2) = 18%) and proportion of participants with positive resection margins (laparoscopic group: 49/333 (adjusted proportion based on meta-analysis estimate: 14.3%) vs open group: 208/1133 (18.4%); OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.10; 1466 participants; 10 studies; I(2) = 6%) were also imprecise. Mean length of hospital stay was shorter by 2.43 days in the laparoscopic group than in the open group (MD -2.43 days, 95% CI -3.13 to -1.73; 1068 participants; five studies; I(2) = 0%). None of the included studies reported quality of life at any point in time, recurrence within six months, time to return to normal activity and time to return to work or blood transfusion requirements.

Authors' conclusions: Currently, no randomised controlled trials have compared laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy versus open distal pancreatectomy for patients with pancreatic cancers. In observational studies, laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy has been associated with shorter hospital stay as compared with open distal pancreatectomy. Currently, no information is available to determine a causal association in the differences between laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy. Observed differences may be a result of confounding due to laparoscopic operation on less extensive cancer and open surgery on more extensive cancer. In addition, differences in length of hospital stay are relevant only if laparoscopic and open surgery procedures are equivalent oncologically. This information is not available currently. Thus, randomised controlled trials are needed to compare laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy versus open distal pancreatectomy with at least two to three years of follow-up. Such studies should include patient-oriented outcomes such as short-term mortality and long-term mortality (at least two to three years); health-related quality of life; complications and the sequelae of complications; resection margins; measures of earlier postoperative recovery such as length of hospital stay, time to return to normal activity and time to return to work (in those who are employed); and recurrence of cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

This report constitutes independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR Cochrane Programme Grants, 13/89/03 ‐ Evidence‐based diagnosis and management of upper digestive, hepato‐biliary, and pancreatic disorders). The views expressed in this publication are those of the review author(s) and are not necessarily those of the National Health Service (NHS), the National Institute for Health Research or the Department of Health.

DR: none known.

KSG: none known.

DAK: received partial sponsorship from Intuitive Surgical (makers of the da Vinci Surgical System) to attend a training course on robotic pancreatic surgery.

CMV: none known.

MGHB: none known.

BRD: none known.

CJHMvL: has written chapters for UpToDate, which are not related to this review.

Figures

1
1
Study flow diagram.
1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy versus open distal pancreatectomy, Outcome 1 Short‐term mortality.
1.2
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1 Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy versus open distal pancreatectomy, Outcome 2 Long‐term mortality.
1.3
1.3. Analysis
Comparison 1 Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy versus open distal pancreatectomy, Outcome 3 Serious adverse events (proportion).
1.4
1.4. Analysis
Comparison 1 Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy versus open distal pancreatectomy, Outcome 4 Pancreatic fistula (grade B or C).
1.5
1.5. Analysis
Comparison 1 Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy versus open distal pancreatectomy, Outcome 5 Recurrence at maximal follow‐up.
1.6
1.6. Analysis
Comparison 1 Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy versus open distal pancreatectomy, Outcome 6 Adverse events (proportion).
1.7
1.7. Analysis
Comparison 1 Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy versus open distal pancreatectomy, Outcome 7 Length of hospital stay.
1.8
1.8. Analysis
Comparison 1 Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy versus open distal pancreatectomy, Outcome 8 Positive resection margins.
2.1
2.1. Analysis
Comparison 2 Subgroup analysis (stapler only), Outcome 1 Short‐term mortality.
2.2
2.2. Analysis
Comparison 2 Subgroup analysis (stapler only), Outcome 2 Long‐term mortality.
2.3
2.3. Analysis
Comparison 2 Subgroup analysis (stapler only), Outcome 3 Serious adverse events (proportion).
2.4
2.4. Analysis
Comparison 2 Subgroup analysis (stapler only), Outcome 4 Pancreatic fistula (grade B or C).
3.1
3.1. Analysis
Comparison 3 Sensitivity analysis, Outcome 1 Length of hospital stay.

Update of

  • doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011391

References

References to studies included in this review

Braga 2015 {published data only}
    1. Braga M, Pecorelli N, Ferrari D, Balzano G, Zuliani W, Castoldi R. Results of 100 consecutive laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies: postoperative outcome, cost‐benefit analysis, and quality of life assessment. Surgical Endoscopy 2015;29(7):1871‐8. - PubMed
Ceppa 2013 {published data only}
    1. Ceppa EP, McCurdy RM, Parikh JA, Kilbane EM, Schmidt CM, Zyromski NJ, et al. Contemporary differences in postoperative outcomes following laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. HPB 2013;15:10.
Dancea 2012 {published data only}
    1. Dancea HC, Obradovic VN, Woll NL, Shabahang MM, Blansfield JA. Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy improves outcomes compared to open at a rural tertiary care center. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques 2012;26:S351.
Hu 2014 {published data only}
    1. Hu M, Zhao G, Wang F, Zhao Z, Li C, Liu R. Laparoscopic versus open distal splenopancreatectomy for the treatment of pancreatic body and tail cancer: a retrospective, mid‐term follow‐up study at a single academic tertiary care institution. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques 2014;28(9):2584‐91. - PubMed
Kooby 2010 {published data only}
    1. Kooby DA, Hawkins WG, Schmidt CM, Weber SM, Bentrem DJ, Gillespie TW, et al. A multicenter analysis of distal pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma: is laparoscopic resection appropriate?. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2010;210(5):779‐85. - PubMed
Lee 2015 {published data only}
    1. Lee SY, Allen PJ, Sadot E, D'Angelica MI, DeMatteo RP, Fong Y, et al. Distal pancreatectomy: a single institution's experience in open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2015;220(1):18‐27. - PubMed
Rehman 2014 {published data only}
    1. Rehman S, John SK, Lochan R, Jaques BC, Manas DM, Charnley RM, et al. Oncological feasibility of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma: a single‐institution comparative study. World Journal of Surgery 2014;38(2):476‐83. - PubMed
    1. Rehman S, Lochan R, French JJ, Jaques BC, Manas DM, White SA. Oncological feasibility of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma of distal pancreas: a single‐institution comparative study. British Journal of Surgery 2013;100(S4):22. - PubMed
Sharpe 2015 {published data only}
    1. Sharpe SM, Talamonti MS, Wang E, Bentrem DJ, Roggin KK, Prinz RA, et al. The laparoscopic approach to distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma results in shorter lengths of stay without compromising oncologic outcomes. American Journal of Surgery 2015;209(3):557‐63. - PubMed
Shin 2015 {published data only}
    1. Nam J, Song KB, Lee YJ, Park KM, Lee JH, Hwang JW, et al. Comparison of outcomes between laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer (pdac). Pancreatology 2013;13(4 Suppl):S9‐S10.
    1. Nam JS, Kim SC, Song KB, Park KM, Lee JH, Hwang JW, et al. Comparison of short term outcomes between laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. HPB 2013;15:64.
    1. Shin SH, Kim SC, Song KB, Hwang DW, Lee JH, Lee D, et al. A comparative study of laparoscopic vs. open distal pancreatectomy for left‐sided ductal adenocarcinoma: a propensity score‐matched analysis. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2015;220(2):177‐85. - PubMed
Stauffer 2015 {published data only}
    1. Stauffer J, Coppola A, Asbun HJ. Pancreatic surgery for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a comparison between the laparoscopic and open surgical approach. Gastroenterology 2015;148(4 Suppl):S1166‐S7.
Vijan 2010 {published data only}
    1. Vijan SS, Ahmed KA, Harmsen WS, Que FG, Reid‐Lombardo KM, Nagorney DM, et al. Laparoscopic vs open distal pancreatectomy: a single‐institution comparative study. Archives of Surgery 2010;145(7):616‐21. - PubMed
Zhang 2014 {published data only}
    1. Zhang Y, Chen XM, Sun DL. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a single‐institution comparative study. World Journal of Surgical Oncology 2014;12:327. - PMC - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Abu Hilal 2012 {published data only}
    1. Abu Hilal M, Hamdan M, Fabio F, Pearce NW, Johnson CD. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a clinical and cost‐effectiveness study. Surgical Endoscopy 2012;26(6):1670‐4. - PubMed
Ahmed 2015 {published data only}
    1. Ahmed R, Walsh CM, Makary MA. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Clinical Liver Disease 2015;5(3):51‐3. - PMC - PubMed
Baker 2011 {published data only}
    1. Baker MS, Bentrem DJ, Ujiki MB, Stocker S, Talamonti MS. Adding days spent in readmission to the initial postoperative length of stay limits the perceived benefit of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy when compared with open distal pancreatectomy. American Journal of Surgery 2011;201(3):295‐9; discussion 299‐300. - PubMed
Baker 2013 {published data only}
    1. Baker M, Sherman KL, Hayman AV, Prinz R, Bentrem DJ, Talamonti M. Defining quality for distal pancreatectomy: does the laparoscopic approach protect patients from poor quality outcomes?. Gastroenterology 2012;1):S1078‐S9. - PubMed
    1. Baker MS, Sherman KL, Stocker S, Hayman AV, Bentrem DJ, Prinz RA, et al. Defining quality for distal pancreatectomy: does the laparoscopic approach protect patients from poor quality outcomes?. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2013;17(2):273‐80. - PubMed
Barrie 2014 {published data only}
    1. Barrie J, Deshpande R, O'Reilly D, Carino ND, Ammori B. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for the treatment of pre‐malignant and malignant lesions. British Journal of Surgery 2014;101(S6):22.
    1. Barrie J, Deshpande R, O'Reilly D, Liguori Carino N, Ammori BJ. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for the treatment of pre‐malignant and malignant lesions. Pancreas 2014;43(8):1343‐4.
Belli 2012 {published data only}
    1. Belli G, Fantini C, D'Agostino A, Limongelli P, Cioffi L, Belli A, et al. Laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy for left sided pancreatic lesions. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques 2012;26:S41. - PubMed
    1. Belli G, Limongelli P, Gostino D, Fantini C, Cioffi L, Belli A, et al. Laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy for left‐sided pancreatic lesions. HPB 2011;13:105‐6.
Butturini 2011 {published data only}
    1. Butturini G, Partelli S, Crippa S, Malleo G, Casetti L, Melotti GL, et al. Resume of work after distal pancreatectomy: laparoscopic approach is better. A single institution comparative study on 114 patients. Pancreas 2009;38(8):986.
    1. Butturini G, Partelli S, Crippa S, Malleo G, Rossini R, Casetti L, et al. Perioperative and long‐term results after left pancreatectomy: a single‐institution, non‐randomized, comparative study between open and laparoscopic approach. Surgical Endoscopy 2011;25(9):2871‐8. - PubMed
Cao 2014 {published data only}
    1. Cao HST, Lopez N, Chang DC, Lowy AM, Bouvet M, Baumgartner JM, et al. Improved perioperative outcomes with minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy results from a population‐based analysis. JAMA Surgery 2014;149(3):237‐43. - PMC - PubMed
Casadei 2010 {published data only}
    1. Casadei R, Ricci C, D'Ambra M, Marrano N, Alagna V, Rega D, et al. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy in pancreatic tumours: a case‐control study. Updates in Surgery 2010;62(3‐4):171‐4. - PubMed
Cheek 2014 {published data only}
    1. Cheek S, Patel S, Osman H, Jeyarajah D. The benefits of laparoscopic pancreatectomy: it does make a difference. HPB 2014;16(S1):71.
Chen 2012 {published data only}
    1. Chen J, Jin G, Shao C, Cai X, Shao Z, Hao J, et al. Comparative study of laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy. Academic Journal of Second Military Medical University 2012;33(9):996‐1001.
Cho 2011 {published data only}
    1. Cho CS, Kooby DA, Schmidt CM, Nakeeb A, Bentrem DJ, Merchant NB, et al. Laparoscopic versus open left pancreatectomy: can preoperative factors indicate the safer technique?. Annals of Surgery 2011;253(5):975‐80. - PubMed
Chung 2014 {published data only}
    1. Chung JC, Kim HC, Song OP. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for benign or borderline malignant pancreatic tumors. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology 2014;25(Suppl 1):S162‐6. - PubMed
Dancea 2012a {published data only}
    1. Dancea HC, Obradovic VN, Woll NL, Shabahang MM, Blansfield JA. Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy improves outcomes compared to open at a rural tertiary care center. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques 2012;26:S351.
Daouadi 2011 {published data only}
    1. Daouadi M, Steel JL, Choudry MH, Magge DR, Zureikat AH, Bartlett DL, et al. Outcomes of minimally‐invasive distal pancreatectomy: single institution comparison of robotic and laparoscopic methods. HPB 2011;13:15‐6.
de Rooij 2015 {published data only}
    1. Rooij T, Jilesen AP, Boerma D, Bonsing BA, Bosscha K, Dam RM, et al. A nationwide comparison of laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy for benign and malignant disease. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2015;220(3):263‐70.e1. - PubMed
DiNorcia 2010 {published data only}
    1. DiNorcia J, Schrope BA, Lee MK, Reavey PL, Lee JA, Chabot JA, et al. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy offers shorter hospital stays with fewer complications. Gastroenterology 2010;138(5 Suppl):S875. - PMC - PubMed
    1. DiNorcia J, Schrope BA, Lee MK, Reavey PL, Rosen SJ, Lee JA, et al. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy offers shorter hospital stays with fewer complications. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2010;14(11):1804‐12. - PMC - PubMed
Duran 2014 {published data only}
    1. Duran H, Ielpo B, Caruso R, Ferri V, Quijano Y, Diaz E, et al. Does robotic distal pancreatectomy surgery offer similar results as laparoscopic and open approach? A comparative study from a single medical center. International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery 2014;10(3):280‐5. - PubMed
Durlik 2013 {published data only}
    1. Durlik M, Matejak‐Gorska M, Jaworowski R, Kaszycka Z, Baumgart K. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy ‐ new standard in the pancreatic surgery. Polski Przeglad Chirurgiczny 2013;85(10):589‐97. - PubMed
Ejaz 2014 {published data only}
    1. Ejaz A, Sachs T, He J, Spolverato G, Hirose K, Ahuja N, et al. A comparison of open and minimally invasive surgery for hepatic and pancreatic resections using the nationwide inpatient sample. Surgery 2014;156(3):538‐47. - PMC - PubMed
Eom 2008 {published data only}
    1. Eom BW, Jang JY, Lee SE, Han HS, Yoon YS, Kim SW. Clinical outcomes compared between laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy. Surgical Endoscopy 2008;22(5):1334‐8. - PubMed
Ferrara 2014 {published data only}
    1. Ferrara MJ, Croome KP, Farnell MB, Que FG, Reid Lombardo KM, Truty MJ, et al. Readmission and prolonged hospital stay after distal pancreatectomy: advantage laparoscopic approach. Gastroenterology 2014;146(5 Suppl):S‐1049.
Finan 2009 {published data only}
    1. Finan KR, Cannon EE, Kim EJ, Wesley MM, Arnoletti PJ, Heslin MJ, et al. Laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy: a comparison of outcomes. American Surgeon 2009;75(8):671‐9. - PubMed
Fox 2012 {published data only}
    1. Fox AM, Pitzul K, Bhojani F, Kaplan M, Moulton CA, Wei AC, et al. Comparison of outcomes and costs between laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and open resection at a single center. Surgical Endoscopy 2012;26(5):1220‐30. - PubMed
    1. Fox AM, Pitzul KB, Bhojani FD, Kaplan M, Moulton CA, Wei A, et al. Outcomes and costs of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: comparison to open resection in a single centre. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques 2011;25:S218. - PubMed
Gumbs 2008 {published data only}
    1. Gumbs AA, Gres P, Madureira FA, Gayet B. Laparoscopic vs. open resection of noninvasive intraductal pancreatic mucinous neoplasms. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2008;12(4):707‐12. - PubMed
Jayaraman 2010 {published data only}
    1. Jayaraman S, Gonen M, Brennan MF, D'Angelica MI, DeMatteo RP, Fong Y, et al. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: evolution of a technique at a single institution. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2010;211(4):503‐9. - PubMed
Jeon 2014 {published data only}
    1. Jeon J, Jung J, Kim D, Kim J, Chon S, Hwang J. Comparison of open with laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in low volume center. HPB 2014;16(S2):618‐9.
Kang 2010 {published data only}
    1. Kang CM, Kim DH, Lee WJ. Ten years of experience with resection of left‐sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: evolution and initial experience to a laparoscopic approach. Surgical Endoscopy 2010;24(7):1533‐41. - PubMed
Kausar 2010 {published data only}
    1. Kausar A, Ajala‐Agbo T, O'Reilly D, Sherlock D, Ammori BJ. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a comparative case‐matched study. HPB 2010;12:201.
    1. Kausar A, Sherlock D, O'Reilly D, Ammori B. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a comparative casematched study. Pancreatology 2010;10(2‐3):289‐90.
Kooby 2008 {published data only}
    1. Kooby DA, Gillespie T, Bentrem D, Nakeeb A, Schmidt MC, Merchant NB, et al. Left‐sided pancreatectomy: a multicenter comparison of laparoscopic and open approaches. Annals of Surgery 2008;248(3):438‐46. - PubMed
Langan 2014 {published data only}
    1. Langan RC, Graham JA, Chin AB, Rubinstein AJ, Oza K, Nusbaum JA, et al. Laparoscopic‐assisted versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: early favorable physical quality‐of‐life measures. Surgery 2014;156(2):379‐84. - PubMed
Lee 2014 {published data only}
    1. Lee SH, Hwang HK, Choi SH, Lee WJ, Kang CM. Minimally invasive ramps in well‐selected left‐sided pancreatic cancer with yonsei criteria: long‐term (>median 3 years) oncologic outcome. Pancreatology 2013;13(4 Suppl):S73. - PubMed
    1. Lee SH, Kang CM, Hwang HK, Choi SH, Lee WJ. Minimally invasive ramps in well‐selected left‐sided pancreatic cancer with yonsei criteria: long‐term (>median 3 years) oncologic outcome. HPB 2014;16(S2):312. - PubMed
    1. Lee SH, Kang CM, Hwang HK, Choi SH, Lee WJ, Chi HS. Minimally invasive ramps in well‐selected left‐sided pancreatic cancer within yonsei criteria: long‐term (>median 3 years) oncologic outcomes. Surgical Endoscopy 2014;28(10):2848‐55. - PubMed
Liao 2014 {published data only}
    1. Liao CH, Yeh CN, Yang SJ, Wang SY, Ouyang CH, Tsai CY, et al. Effectiveness and feasibility of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy on patients at high anesthetic risk. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques 2014;24(12):865‐71. - PubMed
Limongelli 2012 {published data only}
    1. Limongelli P, Belli A, Russo G, Cioffi L, D'Agostino A, Fantini C, et al. Laparoscopic and open surgical treatment of left‐sided pancreatic lesions: clinical outcomes and cost‐effectiveness analysis. Surgical Endoscopy 2012;26(7):1830‐6. - PubMed
Limongelli 2014 {published data only}
    1. Limongelli P, Belli A, Belli G. Laparoscopic versus open left pancreatectomy: do risk factors for pancreatic fistula differ between the 2 techniques?. Annals of Surgery 2014;259(3):e39. - PubMed
Magge 2013 {published data only}
    1. Magge D, Choudry HA, Steel J, Zureikat A, Hughes S, Bartlett D, et al. Oncologic outcomes following minimally‐invasive distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: matched comparison with open resection. Annals of Surgical Oncology 2011;18:S133‐S4.
    1. Magge D, Gooding W, Choudry H, Steve J, Steel J, Zureikat A, et al. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma. JAMA Surgery 2013;148(6):525‐31. - PubMed
Malde 2012 {published data only}
    1. Malde DJ, Khaled Y, Packer J, Liguori N, Deshpande R, O'Reilly D, et al. A comparative study of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy. Pancreatology 2013;13(1):e4. - PubMed
    1. Malde DJ, Khaled Y, Packer J, Liguori N, Deshpande R, O'Reilly D, et al. A comparative study of laparoscopic vs open distal pancreatectomy. Gut 2012;61:A113‐A4.
Matejak‐Gorska 2013 {published data only}
    1. Matejak‐Gorska M, Durlik M. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy ‐ "the new gold standard". Pancreatology 2013;13(3 Suppl):S50. - PubMed
Matsumoto 2008 {published data only}
    1. Matsumoto T, Shibata K, Ohta M, Iwaki K, Uchida H, Yada K, et al. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and open distal pancreatectomy: a nonrandomized comparative study. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques 2008;18(4):340‐3. - PubMed
Mehrabi 2015 {published data only}
    1. Mehrabi A, Hafezi M, Arvin J, Esmaeilzadeh M, Garoussi C, Emami G, et al. A systematic review and meta‐analysis of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign and malignant lesions of the pancreas: it's time to randomize. Surgery 2015;157(1):45‐55. - PubMed
Mehta 2012 {published data only}
    1. Mehta SS, Doumane G, Mura T, Nocca D, Fabre JM. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a single‐institution case‐control study. Surgical Endoscopy 2012;26(2):402‐7. - PubMed
Morikawa 2012 {published data only}
    1. Morikawa T, Naitoh T, Kakyo M, Tanaka N, Watanabe K, Onogawa T, et al. Clinical outcomes compared between laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy: a retrospective cohort study. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques 2012;26:S340.
Nakamura 2009 {published data only}
    1. Nakamura Y, Uchida E, Aimoto T, Matsumoto S, Yoshida H, Tajiri T. Clinical outcome of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Surgery 2009;16(1):35‐41. - PubMed
Newman 2010 {published data only}
    1. Newman N, Edil BH, Makary MA. Lymph node resection in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is equivalent to the open operation. Annals of Surgical Oncology 2010;17:S27.
Nigri 2011 {published data only}
    1. Nigri GR, Rosman AS, Petrucciani N, Fancellu A, Pisano M, Zorcolo L, et al. Metaanalysis of trials comparing minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomies. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques 2011;25(5):1642‐51. - PubMed
Parikh 2015 {published data only}
    1. Parikh J, Anantha Sathyanarayana S, Bendix S, Jacobs MJ. The impact of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy on 90‐day readmissions and cost: is it any better than open?. HPB 2015;17(S1):65.
Pieretti‐Vanmarcke 2014 {published data only}
    1. Pieretti‐Vanmarcke R, Wargo J, Fernandez‐Del Castillo C, Zheng H, Merrill A, Thayer S, et al. Outcomes in open versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. HPB 2014;16(S1):72.
Ricci 2015 {published data only}
    1. Ricci C, Casadei R, Taffurelli G, Toscano F, Pacilio CA, Bogoni S, et al. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2015;19(4):770‐81. - PubMed
Rooij 2014 {published data only}
    1. Rooij TD, Jilesen A, Kazemier G, Boerma D, Bonsing B, Bosscha K, et al. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign and malignant disease: a multicenter retrospective analysis. Pancreatology 2014;14(3 Suppl 1):S9‐S10.
Rosales‐Velderrain 2012 {published data only}
    1. Rosales‐Velderrain A, Bowers SP, Goldberg RF, Clarke TM, Buchanan M, Stauffer J, et al. National trends in resection of the distal pancreas. Gastroenterology 2012;142(5 Suppl):S1061‐S2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosales‐Velderrain A, Bowers SP, Goldberg RF, Clarke TM, Buchanan MA, Stauffer JA, et al. National trends in resection of the distal pancreas. World Journal of Gastroenterology 2012;18(32):4342‐9. - PMC - PubMed
Sahay 2011 {published data only}
    1. Sahay SJ, Gonzalez HD, John J, Fusai G, Sharma D, Davidson BR, et al. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy ‐ an emerging gold standard. Pancreatology 2011;11(3):322.
Sherwinter 2012 {published data only}
    1. Sherwinter DA, Lewis J, Hidalgo JE, Arad J. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2012;16(4):549‐51. - PMC - PubMed
Slepavicius 2014 {published data only}
    1. Slepavicius A, Eismontas V. Clinical outcomes compered between laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy. HPB 2014;16(S2):688.
Soh 2012 {published data only}
    1. Soh YF, Kow A, Wong KY. Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore 2010;39(11 Suppl):S191.
    1. Soh YF, Kow AW, Wong KY, Wang B, Chan CY, Liau KH, et al. Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy: our institution's 5‐year experience. Asian Journal of Surgery 2012;35(1):29‐36. - PubMed
Stauffer 2012 {published data only}
    1. Stauffer J, Rosales‐Velderrain A, Goldberg R, Clarke T, Buchanan M, Bowers S, et al. Surrogate oncologic markers for long term survival are improved with the use of minimal access surgery for pancreatic cancer. HPB 2012;14(S2):231.
Stauffer 2013 {published data only}
    1. Stauffer JA, Rosales‐Velderrain A, Goldberg RF, Bowers SP, Asbun HJ. Comparison of open with laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a single institution's transition over a 7‐year period. HPB 2013;15(2):149‐55. - PMC - PubMed
Tang 2007 {published data only}
    1. Tang CN, Tsui KK, Ha JP, Wong DC, Li MK. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a comparative study. Hepato‐Gastroenterology 2007;54(73):265‐71. - PubMed
Tseng 2011 {published data only}
    1. Tseng WH, Canter RJ, Bold RJ. Perioperative outcomes for open distal pancreatectomy: current benchmarks for comparison. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2011;15(11):2053‐8. - PubMed
Velanovich 2006 {published data only}
    1. Velanovich V. Case‐control comparison of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2006;10(1):95‐8. - PubMed
Vicente 2013 {published data only}
    1. Vicente E. Robotic distal pancreatectomy: comparison with laparoscopic and open technique. HPB 2013;15:26.
Yoon 2012 {published data only}
    1. Yoon YS, Lee KH, Han HS, Cho JY, Hwang DW, Kang MJ, et al. The effect of operative approach on splenic vessel patency after spleen and splenic vessel‐preserving distal pancreatectomy in multi‐institutional study: laparoscopic versus open approach. Pancreas 2012;41(8):1415.
    1. Yoon YS, Lee KH, Han HS, Cho JY, Hwang DW, Kang MJ, et al. The effect of operative approach on splenic vessel patency after spleen and splenic vessel‐preserving distal pancreatectomy in multi‐institutional study: laparoscopic versus open approach. Pancreatology 2013;13(2):e6‐7.
Zhao 2010 {published data only}
    1. Zhao GD, Hu MG, Liu R. [A comparative study of laparoscopic fistal pancreatectomy and open distal pancreatectomy]. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao = Journal of Southern Medical University 2010;30(12):2756‐8. - PubMed
Zibari 2014 {published data only}
    1. Zibari GB, Fallahzadeh MK, Mokhtari N, Hamidian A, Chu Q, Abdehou ST, et al. Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for treatment of pancreatic lesions: a single center experience. HPB 2014;16(S2):240‐1.

Additional references

Abrams 2009
    1. Abrams RA, Lowy AM, O'Reilly EM, Wolff RA, Picozzi VJ, Pisters PW. Combined modality treatment of resectable and borderline resectable pancreas cancer: expert consensus statement. Annals of Surgical Oncology 2009;16(7):1751‐6. - PubMed
ASA 2014
    1. American Society of Anesthesiologists. ASA physical status classification system. www.asahq.org/Home/For‐Members/Clinical‐Information/ASA‐Physical‐Status‐... (accessed 13 November 2014).
Bassi 2005
    1. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005;138(1):8‐13. - PubMed
Bijen 2009
    1. Bijen CB, Vermeulen KM, Mourits MJ, Bock GH. Costs and effects of abdominal versus laparoscopic hysterectomy: systematic review of controlled trials. PLoS One 2009;4(10):e7340. - PMC - PubMed
British Society of Gastroenterology 2005
    1. Pancreatic Section British Society of Gastroenterology. Guidelines for the management of patients with pancreatic cancer periampullary and ampullary carcinomas. Gut 2005;54(Suppl 5):v1‐16. - PMC - PubMed
Cameron 1993
    1. Cameron JL, Pitt HA, Yeo CJ, Lillemoe KD, Kaufman HS, Coleman J. One hundred and forty‐five consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies without mortality. Annals of Surgery 1993;217(5):430‐5. - PMC - PubMed
Clavien 2009
    1. Clavien PA, Barkun J, Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, et al. The Clavien‐Dindo classification of surgical complications: five‐year experience. Annals of Surgery 2009;250(2):187‐96. - PubMed
Daouadi 2013
    1. Daouadi M, Zureikat AH, Zenati MS, Choudry H, Tsung A, Bartlett DL, et al. Robot‐assisted minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy is superior to the laparoscopic technique. Annals of Surgery 2013;257(1):128‐32. - PubMed
Demets 1987
    1. Demets DL. Methods for combining randomized clinical trials: strengths and limitations. Statistics in Medicine 1987;6(3):341‐50. - PubMed
DerSimonian 1986
    1. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta‐analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 1986;7(3):177‐88. - PubMed
Diener 2011
    1. Diener MK, Seiler CM, Rossion I, Kleeff J, Glanemann M, Butturini G, et al. Efficacy of stapler versus hand‐sewn closure after distal pancreatectomy (DISPACT): a randomised, controlled multicentre trial. Lancet 2011;377(9776):1514‐22. - PubMed
Dindo 2004
    1. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Annals of Surgery 2004;240(2):205‐13. - PMC - PubMed
Egger 1997
    1. Egger M, Davey SG, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta‐analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 1997;315(7109):629‐34. - PMC - PubMed
Fernandez‐Cruz 2005
    1. Fernandez‐Cruz L, Orduna D, Cesar‐Borges G, Lopez‐Boado MA. Distal pancreatectomy: en‐bloc splenectomy vs spleen‐preserving pancreatectomy. HPB (Oxford) 2005;7(2):93‐8. - PMC - PubMed
Fernandez‐Cruz 2006
    1. Fernandez‐Cruz L. Distal pancreatic resection: technical differences between open and laparoscopic approaches. HPB (Oxford) 2006;8(1):49‐56. - PMC - PubMed
Ghaneh 2007
    1. Ghaneh P, Costello E, Neoptolemos JP. Biology and management of pancreatic cancer. Gut 2007;56(8):1134‐52. - PMC - PubMed
Gurusamy 2013
    1. Gurusamy KS, Koti R, Fusai G, Davidson BR. Somatostatin analogues for pancreatic surgery. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008370.pub3] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Higgins 2011
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Hopkins 1999
    1. Hopkins MP, Dulai RM, Occhino A, Holda S. The effects of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum on seeding of tumor in port sites in a rat model. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1999;181(6):1329‐34. - PubMed
IARC 2014
    1. International Agency for Research on Cancer. GLOBOCAN 2012. globocan.iarc.fr/Default.aspx (accessed 13 November 2014).
ICH‐GCP 1996
    1. International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. Code of Federal Regulation & ICH Guidelines. Media: Parexel Barnett, 1996.
Kais 2014
    1. Kais H, Hershkovitz Y, Sandbank J, Halevy A. Port site metastases in squamous cell carcinoma of the gallbladder. Israel Medical Association Journal 2014;16(3):177‐9. - PubMed
Keus 2006
    1. Keus F, Jong JA, Gooszen HG, Laarhoven CJ. Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006231] - DOI - PubMed
Liao 2013
    1. Liao WC, Chien KL, Lin YL, Wu MS, Lin JT, Wang HP, et al. Adjuvant treatments for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis. Lancet Oncology 2013;14(11):1095‐103. - PubMed
Livingston 1991
    1. Livingston EH, Welton ML, Reber HA. Surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer. The United States experience. International Journal of Pancreatology 1991;9:153‐7. - PubMed
Ma 2013
    1. Ma J, Siegel R, Jemal A. Pancreatic cancer death rates by race among US men and women, 1970‐2009. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2013;105(22):1694‐700. - PubMed
Montorsi 2012
    1. Montorsi M, Zerbi A, Bassi C, Capussotti L, Coppola R, Sacchi M, et al. Efficacy of an absorbable fibrin sealant patch (TachoSil) after distal pancreatectomy: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Annals of Surgery 2012;256(5):853‐9. - PubMed
Niederhuber 1995
    1. Niederhuber JE, Brennan MF, Menck HR. The National Cancer Data Base report on pancreatic cancer. Cancer 1995;76(9):1671‐7. - PubMed
Nitecki 1995
    1. Nitecki SS, Sarr MG, Colby TV, Heerden JA. Long‐term survival after resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Is it really improving?. Annals of Surgery 1995;221(1):59‐66. - PMC - PubMed
Orr 2010
    1. Orr RK. Outcomes in pancreatic cancer surgery. Surgical Clinics of North America 2010;90(2):219‐34. - PubMed
Palomba 2014
    1. Palomba S, Mandato VD, Sala GB. Isolated port‐site metastasis after robotic hysterectomy for stage IA endometrial adenocarcinoma. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2014;123(3):664. - PubMed
Park 2013
    1. Park JW, Jang JY, Kim EJ, Kang MJ, Kwon W, Chang YR, et al. Effects of pancreatectomy on nutritional state, pancreatic function and quality of life. British Journal of Surgery 2013;100(8):1064‐70. - PubMed
Parkin 2001
    1. Parkin DM, Bray FI, Devesa SS. Cancer burden in the year 2000. The global picture. European Journal of Cancer 2001;37(Suppl 8):S4‐66. - PubMed
Parkin 2005
    1. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2005;55(2):74‐108. - PubMed
Parmar 1998
    1. Parmar MK, Torri V, Stewart L. Extracting summary statistics to perform meta‐analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints. Statistics in Medicine 1998;17(24):2815‐34. - PubMed
RevMan 2014 [Computer program]
    1. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
Reza 2006
    1. Reza MM, Blasco JA, Andradas E, Cantero R, Mayol J. Systematic review of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. British Journal of Surgery 2006;93(8):921‐8. - PubMed
Rindi 2011
    1. Rindi G, Wiedenmann B. Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gut and pancreas: new insights. Nature Reviews in Endocrinology 2011;8(1):54‐64. - PubMed
Rutz 2014
    1. Rutz DR, Squires MH, Maithel SK, Sarmiento JM, Etra JW, Perez SD, et al. Cost comparison analysis of open versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. HPB 2014;16(10):907‐14. - PMC - PubMed
Song 2014
    1. Song J, Kim E, Mobley J, Vemana G, Tanagho Y, Vetter J, et al. Port site metastasis after surgery for renal cell carcinoma: harbinger of future metastasis. Journal of Urology 2014;192(2):364‐8. - PubMed
Sterne 2014
    1. Sterne JAC, Higgins JPT, Reeves BC, on behalf of the Development Group for ACROBAT‐NRSI. A Cochrane Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool: for Non‐Randomized Studies of Interventions (ACROBAT‐NRSI), Version 1.0.0. http://www.riskofbias.info (accessed 25 November 2015).
Suzuki 1995
    1. Suzuki Y, Kuroda Y, Morita A, Fujino Y, Tanioka Y, Kawamura T, et al. Fibrin glue sealing for the prevention of pancreatic fistulas following distal pancreatectomy. Archives of Surgery 1995;130(9):952‐5. - PubMed
Talseth 2014
    1. Talseth A, Lydersen S, Skjedlestad F, Hveem K, Edna TH. Trends in cholecystectomy rates in a defined population during and after the period of transition from open to laparoscopic surgery. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 2014;49(1):92‐8. - PubMed
Trede 1990
    1. Trede M, Schwall G, Saeger HD. Survival after pancreatoduodenectomy. 118 consecutive resections without an operative mortality. Annals of Surgery 1990;211(4):447‐58. - PMC - PubMed
Tucker 2008
    1. Tucker ON, Rela M. Controversies in the management of borderline resectable proximal pancreatic adenocarcinoma with vascular involvement. HPB Surgery 2008;2008:839503. - PMC - PubMed
Walsh 2009
    1. Walsh CA, Walsh SR, Tang TY, Slack M. Total abdominal hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease: a meta‐analysis. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 2009;144(1):3‐7. - PubMed
Yamamoto 1998
    1. Yamamoto M, Ohashi O, Saitoh Y. Japan Pancreatic Cancer Registry: current status. Pancreas 1998;16(3):238‐42. - PubMed

Publication types