Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Aug 22;10(5):1161-8.
doi: 10.1177/1932296816641433. Print 2016 Sep.

Interferences and Limitations in Blood Glucose Self-Testing: An Overview of the Current Knowledge

Affiliations
Review

Interferences and Limitations in Blood Glucose Self-Testing: An Overview of the Current Knowledge

Michael Erbach et al. J Diabetes Sci Technol. .

Abstract

In general, patients with diabetes performing self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) can strongly rely on the accuracy of measurement results. However, various factors such as application errors, extreme environmental conditions, extreme hematocrit values, or medication interferences may potentially falsify blood glucose readings. Incorrect blood glucose readings may lead to treatment errors, for example, incorrect insulin dosing. Therefore, the diabetes team as well as the patients should be well informed about limitations in blood glucose testing. The aim of this publication is to review the current knowledge on limitations and interferences in blood glucose testing with the perspective of their clinical relevance.

Keywords: SMBG; blood glucose testing; diabetes; interference; reliability; self-monitoring of blood glucose.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: RH is an employee of Roche Diabetes Care GmbH, Mannheim, Germany. GF, BK, RZ, LH, and OS are members of national and international advisory boards of Roche Diabetes Care GmbH, Mannheim, Germany

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Relatively small divergences may sum up to a substancial total deviation of −35 mg/dL.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Deviations may also balance themselves, resulting in a total deviation of only +5 mg/dL.

References

    1. Duran A, Martin P, Runkle I, et al. Benefits of self-monitoring blood glucose in the management of new-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus: the St Carlos Study, a prospective randomized clinic-based interventional study with parallel groups. J Diabetes. 2010;2:203-211. - PubMed
    1. Schnell O, Alawi H, Battelino T, et al. Self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetes: recent studies. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013;7:478-488. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Polonsky WH, Fisher L, Schikman CH, et al. Structured self-monitoring of blood glucose significantly reduces A1C levels in poorly controlled, noninsulin-treated type 2 diabetes: results from the Structured Testing Program study. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:262-267. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Klonoff DC, Blonde L, Cembrowski G, et al. Consensus report: the current role of self-monitoring of blood glucose in non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011;5:1529-1548. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care 2016;39(suppl 1):S1-S112. - PubMed

Publication types