Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr;35(4):647-53.
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1334.

Most Americans Do Not Believe That There Is An Association Between Health Care Prices And Quality Of Care

Kathryn A Phillips  1 , David Schleifer  2 , Carolin Hagelskamp  3
Affiliations

Most Americans Do Not Believe That There Is An Association Between Health Care Prices And Quality Of Care

Kathryn A Phillips et al. Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Apr.

Abstract

Many organizations are developing health care price information tools for consumers. However, consumers may avoid low-price care if they perceive price to be associated with quality. We conducted a nationally representative survey to examine whether consumers perceive that price and quality are associated and whether the way in which questions are framed affects consumers' responses. Most Americans (58-71 percent, depending on question framing) did not think that price and quality are associated, but a substantial minority did perceive an association (21-24 percent) or were unsure whether there was one (8-16 percent). Responses to questions framed in terms of high price and high quality differed from responses to questions framed in terms of low price and low quality. People who had compared prices were more likely than those who had not compared prices to perceive that price and quality were associated. We explore implications of these findings, including how behavioral economics can inform approaches to helping consumers use price and quality information.

Keywords: Consumer Issues; Health Economics; Health Spending; Public Opinion.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. De Brantes F, Delbanco S. Report card on state price transparency laws [Internet] Newtown (CT): Health Care Incentives Improvement Institute and Catalyst for Payment Reform; 2013. Mar 18, [cited 2016 Feb 9]. Available from: http://www.hci3.org/wp-content/uploads/files/files/Report_PriceTransLaws....
    1. Pacific Business Group on Health. Price transparency [Internet] San Francisco (CA): PBGH; c 2013. [cited 2016 Feb 9]. (PBGH Policy Brief). Available from: http://www.rwjf.org/content/dam/farm/reports/issue_briefs/2013/rwjf407306.
    1. Muir MA, Alessi SA, King JS. Clarifying costs: can increased price transparency reduce healthcare spending? William and Mary Policy Review. 2013;4(2):319–66.
    1. White C, Ginsburg PB, Tu HT, Reschovsky JD, Smith JM, Liao K. Healthcare price transparency: policy approaches and estimated impacts on spending [Internet] Washington (DC): West Health Policy Center Institute; 2014. May, [cited 2016 Feb 9]. Available from; http://www.westhealth.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Price-Transparency-....
    1. Claxton G, Rae M, Panchal N, Whitmore H, Damico A, Kenward K, et al. Health benefits in 2015: stable trends in the employer market. Health Aff (Millwood) 2015;34(10):1779–88. - PubMed

Publication types