Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr 15;73(8):576-85.
doi: 10.2146/ajhp150565.

Recommendations for selecting drug-drug interactions for clinical decision support

Hugh Tilson  1 , Lisa E Hines  2 , Gerald McEvoy  3 , David M Weinstein  4 , Philip D Hansten  5 , Karl Matuszewski  6 , Marianne le Comte  7 , Stefanie Higby-Baker  8 , Joseph T Hanlon  9 , Lynn Pezzullo  2 , Kathleen Vieson  10 , Amy L Helwig  11 , Shiew-Mei Huang  12 , Anthony Perre  13 , David W Bates  14 , John Poikonen  15 , Michael A Wittie  16 , Amy J Grizzle  17 , Mary Brown  18 , Daniel C Malone  19
Affiliations

Recommendations for selecting drug-drug interactions for clinical decision support

Hugh Tilson et al. Am J Health Syst Pharm. .

Abstract

Purpose: Recommendations for including drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in clinical decision support (CDS) are presented.

Summary: A conference series was conducted to improve CDS for DDIs. A work group consisting of 20 experts in pharmacology, drug information, and CDS from academia, government agencies, health information vendors, and healthcare organizations was convened to address (1) the process to use for developing and maintaining a standard set of DDIs, (2) the information that should be included in a knowledge base of standard DDIs, (3) whether a list of contraindicated drug pairs can or should be established, and (4) how to more intelligently filter DDI alerts. We recommend a transparent, systematic, and evidence-driven process with graded recommendations by a consensus panel of experts and oversight by a national organization. We outline key DDI information needed to help guide clinician decision-making. We recommend judicious classification of DDIs as contraindicated and more research to identify methods to safely reduce repetitive and less-relevant alerts.

Conclusion: An expert panel with a centralized organizer or convener should be established to develop and maintain a standard set of DDIs for CDS in the United States. The process should be evidence driven, transparent, and systematic, with feedback from multiple stakeholders for continuous improvement. The scope of the expert panel's work should be carefully managed to ensure that the process is sustainable. Support for research to improve DDI alerting in the future is also needed. Adoption of these steps may lead to consistent and clinically relevant content for interruptive DDIs, thus reducing alert fatigue and improving patient safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

and Conflict of Interest Statement: The other authors have no competing interests or conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic of Transparent and Systematic Process to Develop and Maintain a Standard Set of DDIs for CDS Alerts
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Preventing Medication Errors: Quality Chasm Series. [Accessed April 22, 2014];2006 http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2006/Preventing-Medication-Errors-Quality-Cha....
    1. Chaffee BW, Zimmerman CR. Developing and implementing clinical decision support for use in a computerized prescriber-order-entry system. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2010;67(5):391–400. - PubMed
    1. Hansten PD, Horn JR, Hazlet TK. ORCA: OpeRational ClassificAtion of drug interactions. J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash) 2001;41(2):161–165. - PubMed
    1. CMS. Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Core Measures: Measure 2 of 15. [Accessed 01/09/2013];Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. 2010 http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentiveProg....
    1. Blumenthal D, Tavenner M. The "meaningful use" regulation for electronic health records. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(6):501–504. - PubMed

MeSH terms