Change in Pain and Physical Function Following Bariatric Surgery for Severe Obesity
- PMID: 27046364
- PMCID: PMC4856477
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.3010
Change in Pain and Physical Function Following Bariatric Surgery for Severe Obesity
Abstract
Importance: The variability and durability of improvements in pain and physical function following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) are not well described.
Objectives: To report changes in pain and physical function in the first 3 years following bariatric surgery, and to identify factors associated with improvement.
Design, setting, and participants: The Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery-2 is an observational cohort study at 10 US hospitals. Adults with severe obesity undergoing bariatric surgery were recruited between February 2005 and February 2009. Research assessments were conducted prior to surgery and annually thereafter. Three-year follow-up through October 2012 is reported.
Exposures: Bariatric surgery as clinical care.
Main outcomes and measures: Primary outcomes were clinically meaningful presurgery to postsurgery improvements in pain and function using scores from the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) (ie, improvement of ≥5 points on the norm-based score [range, 0-100]) and 400-meter walk time (ie, improvement of ≥24 seconds) using established thresholds. The secondary outcome was clinically meaningful improvement using the Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (ie, improvement of ≥9.7 pain points and ≥9.3 function points on the transformed score [range, 0-100]).
Results: Of 2458 participants, 2221 completed baseline and follow-up assessments (1743 [78.5%] were women; median age was 47 years; median body mass index [BMI] was 45.9; 70.4% underwent RYGB; 25.0% underwent LAGB). At year 1, clinically meaningful improvements were shown in 57.6% (95% CI, 55.3%-59.9%) of participants for bodily pain, 76.5% (95% CI, 74.6%-78.5%) for physical function, and 59.5% (95% CI, 56.4%-62.7%) for walk time. Additionally, among participants with severe knee or disability (633), or hip pain or disability (500) at baseline, approximately three-fourths experienced joint-specific improvements in knee pain (77.1% [95% CI, 73.5%-80.7%]) and in hip function (79.2% [95% CI, 75.3%-83.1%]). Between year 1 and year 3, rates of improvement significantly decreased to 48.6% (95% CI, 46.0%-51.1%) for bodily pain and to 70.2% (95% CI, 67.8%-72.5%) for physical function, but improvement rates for walk time, knee and hip pain, and knee and hip function did not (P for all ≥.05). Younger age, male sex, higher income, lower BMI, and fewer depressive symptoms presurgery; no diabetes and no venous edema with ulcerations postsurgery (either no history or remission); and presurgery-to-postsurgery reductions in weight and depressive symptoms were associated with presurgery-to-postsurgery improvements in multiple outcomes at years 1, 2, and 3.
Conclusions and relevance: Among a cohort of participants with severe obesity undergoing bariatric surgery, a large percentage experienced improvement, compared with baseline, in pain, physical function, and walk time over 3 years, but the percentage with improvement in pain and physical function decreased between year 1 and year 3.
Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00465829.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures


Comment in
-
Most patients have less pain and disability after bariatric surgery.BMJ. 2016 Apr 5;353:i1928. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i1928. BMJ. 2016. PMID: 27053600 No abstract available.
-
Pain and Physical Function Following Bariatric Surgery.JAMA. 2016 Aug 16;316(7):770-1. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.8590. JAMA. 2016. PMID: 27533164 No abstract available.
-
Pain and Physical Function Following Bariatric Surgery--Reply.JAMA. 2016 Aug 16;316(7):771. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.8593. JAMA. 2016. PMID: 27533166 No abstract available.
References
-
- Hills AP, Hennig EM, Byrne NM, Steele JR. The biomechanics of adiposity—structural and functional limitations of obesity and implications for movement. Obes Rev. 2002;3(1):35–43. - PubMed
-
- Hulens M, Vansant G, Lysens R, Claessens AL, Muls E. Exercise capacity in lean versus obese women. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2001;11(5):305–309. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
- U01 DK066555/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 TR000005/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- UL1-RR024153/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 RR024153/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
- U01-DK66526/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- M01RR-00037/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 RR024996/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK066585/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK066557/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK066568/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK066526/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- M01 RR000037/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
- U01-DK66471/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01-DK66585/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01-DK66667/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 TR002384/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- UL1-RR024996/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
- U01-DK66555/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK066667/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01-DK66568/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK066471/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials