Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Spring;16(1):73-80.

Improving Patient Safety Event Reporting Among Residents and Teaching Faculty

Affiliations

Improving Patient Safety Event Reporting Among Residents and Teaching Faculty

Michelle Y Louis et al. Ochsner J. 2016 Spring.

Abstract

Background: A June 2012 site visit report from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Clinical Learning Environment Review revealed that residents and physicians at TriHealth, Inc., a large, nonprofit independent academic medical center serving the Greater Cincinnati area in Ohio, had an opportunity to improve their awareness and understanding of the hospital's system for reporting patient safety concerns in 3 areas: (1) what constitutes a reportable patient safety event, (2) who is responsible for reporting, and (3) how to use the hospital's current reporting system.

Methods: To improve the culture of patient safety, we designed a quality improvement project with the goal to increase patient safety event reporting among residents and teaching faculty. An anonymous questionnaire assessed physicians' and residents' attitudes and experience regarding patient safety event reporting. An educational intervention was provided in each graduate medical education program to improve knowledge and skills related to patient safety event reporting, and the anonymous questionnaire was distributed after the intervention. We compared the responses to the preintervention and postintervention questionnaires and tracked monthly patient safety event reports for 1 year postintervention.

Results: The number of patient safety event reports increased following the educational intervention; however, we saw wide variability in reporting per month. On the postintervention questionnaire, participants demonstrated improved knowledge and attitudes toward patient safety event reporting.

Conclusion: The goal of this unique project was to increase patient safety event reporting by both residents and teaching faculty in 6 residency programs through education. We achieved this goal through an educational intervention tailored to the institution's new event reporting system delivered to each residency program. We clearly understand that improvements in quality and patient safety require ongoing effort. The keys to ongoing sustainability include (1) developing patient safety faculty and resident experts in each training program to teach patient safety and to be role models, (2) working toward decreasing the barriers to reporting, and (3) providing timely feedback and system changes.

Keywords: Education–graduate–medical; hospital incident reporting; medical errors; patient safety; quality improvement; risk management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Healthcare Providers' Perceptions of Safety Events Questionnaire.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Resident and teaching faculty safety event reporting. From June 2011 to June 2014, the number of reported events by residents was x¯=1 (SD=1.07) compared to x¯=4 (SD=2.66) reported by both residents and teaching faculty from July 2014 to June 2015.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Difference between the preintervention and postintervention responses to 4 questions on the Healthcare Providers' Perceptions of Safety Events Questionnaire. The distribution of responses is presented as percentages. The agree and strongly agree responses are aggregated on the right, and the disagree and strongly disagree responses are aggregated on the left. For example, results from preintervention indicate that 42% of respondents did not know which incidents/errors to report. However, following the intervention, this percentage significantly decreased to 8% (P<0.05). *The response to this question was statistically significant for obstetrics/gynecology only (P<0.05).
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Residents and teaching faculty demonstrated an improvement in their knowledge of who is responsible for reporting medical errors (internal medicine and obstetrics/gynecology: P<0.05).
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Residents and teaching faculty demonstrated an improvement in their knowledge of which incidents/errors to report (internal medicine, obstetrics/gynecology, and surgery: P<0.05).

References

    1. Institute of Medicine. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. eds Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999. - PubMed
    1. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. ACGME Common Program Requirements; 2013. . https://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/CP.... Accessed November 25, 2015.
    1. Boike JR, Bortman JS, Radosta JM, et al. Patient safety event reporting expectation: does it influence residents' attitudes and reporting behaviors? J Patient Saf. 2013. June; 9 2: 59- 67. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e3182676e53. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kaldjian LC, Jones EW, Rosenthal GE, Tripp-Reimer T, Hillis SL. An empirically derived taxonomy of factors affecting physicians' willingness to disclose medical errors. J Gen Intern Med. 2006. September; 21 9: 942- 948. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kaldjian LC, Jones EW, Wu BJ, Forman-Hoffman VL, Levi BH, Rosenthal GE. Reporting medical errors to improve patient safety: a survey of physicians in teaching hospitals. Arch Intern Med. 2008. January 14; 168 1: 40- 46. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2007.12. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources