Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Dec 8;47(4):460-6.
doi: 10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30129-4. eCollection 2012 Jul-Aug.

ELIGIBILITY FOR THE HIP-RESURFACING ARTHROPLASTY PROCEDURE: AN EVALUATION ON 592 HIPS

Roberto Dantas Queiroz  1 , Rafael Salomon Silva Faria  2 , David Marcelo Duarte  2 , Marcelo Itiro Takano  3 , Mauricio Morita Sugiyama  4
Affiliations

ELIGIBILITY FOR THE HIP-RESURFACING ARTHROPLASTY PROCEDURE: AN EVALUATION ON 592 HIPS

Roberto Dantas Queiroz et al. Rev Bras Ortop. .

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the percentage of ideal patients who would be eligible for hip-resurfacing surgery at a reference service for hip arthroplasty.

Methods: Out of all the cases of hip arthroplasty operated at Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo (HSPE) between January 2009 and December 2010, we assessed a total of 592 procedures that would fit the criteria for indication for resurfacing arthroplasty, after clinical and radiological evaluation according to the criteria established by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and by Seyler et al.

Results: Among the total number of hip replacement arthroplasty cases, 5.74% of the patients were eligible. Among the patients who underwent primary arthroplasty, we found that 8.23% presented ideal conditions for this procedure.

Conclusion: The study demonstrated that this type of surgery still has a limited role among hip surgery methods.

Keywords: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Femoral Head; Femoral Neck Fractures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) compromising of the femoral head greater than 50%; (B) femoral neck fracture; (C) multiple cysts.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Seyler algorithm.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Patients assessed through the three stages of the study and final candidates for resurfacing.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Patients eligible for HRA out of the total number of patients who underwent replacement arthroplasty at HSPE between January 2009 and December 2010.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Percentage indication of HRA out of the primary hip arthroplasties performed.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Seyler TM, Marker DR, Boyd HS, Zywiel MG, McGrath MS, Mont MA. Preoperative evaluation to determine candidates for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(Suppl 6):32–41. - PubMed
    1. Amstutz HC, Ball ST, Le Duff MJ, Dorey FJ. Resurfacing THA for patients younger than 50 year: results of 2- to 9-year followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;(460):159–164. - PubMed
    1. Amstutz HC, Campbell PA, Le Duff MJ. Fracture of the neck of the femur after surface arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(9):1874–1877. - PubMed
    1. Beaulé PE, Dorey FJ, Le Duff MJ, Gruen T, Amstutz HC. Risk factors affecting outcome of metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;(418):87–93. - PubMed
    1. Boyd HS, Ulrich SD, Seyler TM, Marulanda GA, Mont MA. Resurfacing for Perthes disease: an alternative to standard hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;465:80–85. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources