Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 May 2;6(5):a026070.
doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a026070.

p53 in the DNA-Damage-Repair Process

Affiliations
Review

p53 in the DNA-Damage-Repair Process

Ashley B Williams et al. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. .

Abstract

The cells in the human body are continuously challenged by a variety of genotoxic attacks. Erroneous repair of the DNA can lead to mutations and chromosomal aberrations that can alter the functions of tumor suppressor genes or oncogenes, thus causing cancer development. As a central tumor suppressor, p53 guards the genome by orchestrating a variety of DNA-damage-response (DDR) mechanisms. Already early in metazoan evolution, p53 started controlling the apoptotic demise of genomically compromised cells. p53 plays a prominent role as a facilitator of DNA repair by halting the cell cycle to allow time for the repair machineries to restore genome stability. In addition, p53 took on diverse roles to also directly impact the activity of various DNA-repair systems. It thus appears as if p53 is multitasking in providing protection from cancer development by maintaining genome stability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Examples of p53 interactions with DNA-repair pathways. (AC) Simplified representations of canonical DNA-repair pathways: nucleotide excision repair (NER), base excision repair (BER), and mismatch repair (MMR). Factors with transcription-related interactions are highlighted in orange and factors with nontranscriptional interactions are highlighted in blue. Note that OGG1 has both transcription-dependent and -independent interactions with p53 during base excision repair. Red arrows indicate regulatory effects on p53.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Examples of p53 interactions with double-strand break repair pathways (left) and p53 checkpoint signaling (right). (A,B) Simplified representations of double-strand break repair via homologous recombination (HR) and nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ). (C) Simplified representation of p53 signaling at double-strand breaks. Factors with transcription-related interactions are highlighted in orange and factors with nontranscriptional interactions are highlighted in blue. Note that RAD51 has both transcription-dependent and -independent interactions with p53 during base excision repair. Red labels and red arrows indicate regulatory effects on p53.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Achanta G, Huang P. 2004. Role of p53 in sensing oxidative DNA damage in response to reactive oxygen species-generating agents. Cancer Res 64: 6233–6239. - PubMed
    1. Adimoolam S, Ford JM. 2002. p53 and DNA damage-inducible expression of the xeroderma pigmentosum group C gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99: 12985–12990. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Akyüz N, Boehden GS, Süsse S, Rimek A, Preuss U, Scheidtmann K-H, Wiesmüller L. 2002. DNA substrate dependence of p53-mediated regulation of double-strand break repair. Mol Cell Biol 22: 6306–6317. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arias-Lopez C, Lazaro-Trueba I, Kerr P, Lord CJ, Dexter T, Iravani M, Ashworth A, Silva A. 2006. p53 modulates homologous recombination by transcriptional regulation of the RAD51 gene. EMBO Rep 7: 219–224. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Babbe H, McMenamin J, Hobeika E, Wang J, Rodig SJ, Reth M, Leder P. 2009. Genomic instability resulting from Blm deficiency compromises development, maintenance, and function of the B cell lineage. J Immunol 182: 347–360. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances