Comparative effectiveness of coronary CT angiography vs stress cardiac imaging in patients following hospital admission for chest pain work-up: The Prospective First Evaluation in Chest Pain (PERFECT) Trial
- PMID: 27048306
- DOI: 10.1007/s12350-015-0354-6
Comparative effectiveness of coronary CT angiography vs stress cardiac imaging in patients following hospital admission for chest pain work-up: The Prospective First Evaluation in Chest Pain (PERFECT) Trial
Abstract
Background: Because the frequency of cardiac event rates is low among chest pain patients following either performance of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) or stress testing, there is a need to better assess how these tests influence the central management decisions that follow from cardiac testing. The present study was performed to assess the relative impact of CCTA vs stress testing on medical therapies and downstream resource utilization among patients admitted for the work-up of chest pain.
Methods: The admitted patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either cardiac imaging stress test or CCTA. Primary outcomes were time to discharge, change in medication usage, and frequency of downstream testing, cardiac interventions, and cardiovascular re-hospitalizations. We randomized 411 patients, 205 to stress testing, and 206 to CCTA.
Results: There were no differences in time to discharge or initiation of new cardiac medications at discharge. At 1 year follow-up, there was no difference in the number of patients who underwent cardiovascular downstream tests in the CCTA vs stress test patients (21% vs 15%, P = .1) or cardiovascular hospitalizations (14% vs 16%, P = .5). However, there was a higher frequency of invasive angiography in the CCTA group (11% vs 2%, P = .001) and percutaneous coronary interventions (6% vs 0%, P < .001).
Conclusions: Randomization of hospitalized patients admitted for chest pain work-up to either CCTA or to stress testing resulted in similar discharge times, change in medical therapies at discharge, frequency of downstream noninvasive testing, and repeat hospitalizations. However, a higher frequency of invasive coronary angiography and revascularization procedures were performed in the CCTA arm. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01604655.).
Keywords: Coronary computed tomography angiography; chest pain, resource utilization; stress testing.
Comment in
-
Coronary computed tomography angiography: How should we act on what we find?J Nucl Cardiol. 2017 Aug;24(4):1279-1281. doi: 10.1007/s12350-016-0494-3. Epub 2016 Apr 12. J Nucl Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 27072002 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Noninvasive Cardiac Testing vs Clinical Evaluation Alone in Acute Chest Pain: A Secondary Analysis of the ROMICAT-II Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Feb 1;178(2):212-219. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.7360. JAMA Intern Med. 2018. PMID: 29138794 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comparative Trends and Downstream Outcomes of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography and Cardiac Stress Testing in Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain: An Administrative Claims Analysis.Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Sep;23(9):1022-30. doi: 10.1111/acem.13005. Epub 2016 Sep 7. Acad Emerg Med. 2016. PMID: 27155236
-
Comparison of Rates of Coronary Angiography and Combined Testing Procedures in Patients Seen in the Emergency Room With Chest Pain (But No Objective Acute Coronary Syndrome Findings) Having Coronary Computed Tomography Versus Exercise Stress Testing.Am J Cardiol. 2016 Jul 15;118(2):155-61. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.04.051. Epub 2016 May 4. Am J Cardiol. 2016. PMID: 27236251
-
Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Invasive Coronary Angiography in Stable Chest Pain: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023 Nov;16(11):e015800. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.123.015800. Epub 2023 Nov 21. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023. PMID: 37988448
-
Current Evidence in Cardiothoracic Imaging: Growing Evidence for Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography as a First-line Test in Stable Chest Pain.J Thorac Imaging. 2019 Jan;34(1):4-11. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000357. J Thorac Imaging. 2019. PMID: 30157094 Review.
Cited by
-
Cardiac CT in the Emergency Department: Contrasting Evidence from Registries and Randomized Controlled Trials.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2018 Mar 8;20(4):24. doi: 10.1007/s11886-018-0965-z. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2018. PMID: 29520449 Review.
-
Appropriateness of Cardiovascular Imaging in the Initial Assessment of Possible Acute Coronary Syndrome in the Emergency Department.Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Aug 24;23(9):293. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2309293. eCollection 2022 Sep. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022. PMID: 39077711 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography vs Functional Stress Testing for Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Nov 1;177(11):1623-1631. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.4772. JAMA Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28973101 Free PMC article.
-
Preventive Management of Nonobstructive CAD After Coronary CT Angiography in the Emergency Department.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Feb;13(2 Pt 1):437-448. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.04.021. Epub 2019 Jul 17. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020. PMID: 31326481 Free PMC article.
-
Functional compared to anatomical imaging in the initial evaluation of patients with suspected coronary artery disease: An international, multi-center, randomized controlled trial (IAEA-SPECT/CTA study).J Nucl Cardiol. 2017 Apr;24(2):507-517. doi: 10.1007/s12350-016-0664-3. Epub 2016 Oct 28. J Nucl Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 27796852 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical