Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Oct;9(5):383-93.
doi: 10.1007/s40271-016-0168-x.

Engaging Older Adults in Health Care Decision-Making: A Realist Synthesis

Affiliations
Review

Engaging Older Adults in Health Care Decision-Making: A Realist Synthesis

Jacobi Elliott et al. Patient. 2016 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Engagement in healthcare decision making has been recognized as an important, and often lacking, aspect of care, especially in the care of older adults who are major users of the healthcare system.

Objective: We aimed to conduct a review of available knowledge on engagement in healthcare decision making with a focus on older patients and their caregivers.

Methods: We conducted a realist synthesis focusing on strategies for engagement of older patients and their caregivers in healthcare decision making. The synthesis encompassed theoretical frameworks and both peer-reviewed and grey literature. Expert consultations included interviews (n = 2) with academics and group consultations (n = 3) with older adults and their caregivers. Abstracts that reported description, assessment, or evaluation of strategies for engagement of adult patients, families, or caregivers (i.e., that report on actual experiences of engagement) were included.

Results: The search generated 15,683 articles, 663 of which were pertinent to healthcare decision making. Theoretical and empirical work identified a range of strategies and levels of engagement of older patients and their families in healthcare decision making. The importance of communication emerged as a key recommendation for meaningful engagement among providers and patients and their caregivers. The principles developed in this study should be implemented with consideration of the context in which care is being provided.

Conclusions: We have developed a framework that promotes the engagement of patients and their caregivers as equal partners in healthcare decision making. Future research should implement and test the framework in various clinical settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Compliance with Ethical Standards Funding This work was supported by a Knowledge Synthesis Grant from the Technology Evaluation in the Elderly Network (TVN), Grant # KS2013-08, which is funded by the Government of Canada’s Networks of Centres of Excellence (NCE) Program. Conflicts of interest JE, HM, JA, KH, VB, and PS declare they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Search results
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
CMO: a developing meaningful relationships; b developing trust between patient and providers; c improving communication between patients and providers

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brand C, Scott I, Greenberg P, Sargious P. Chronic disease management: time for consultant physicians to take more leadership in system redesign. Intern Med J. 2007;37:653–659. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2007.01442.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Coulter A, Entwistle V, Gilbert D. Sharing decisions with patients: is the information good enough? BMJ. 1999;318(7179):318–322. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7179.318. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coulter A, Ellins J. Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients. BMJ. 2007;335:24–27. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39246.581169.80. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gallivan J, Kovacs Burns K, Bellows M, Elgenseher C. The many faces of patient engagement. J Participat Med. 2012;4:32.
    1. Kastner M, Tricco A, Soobiah C, Lillie E, Perrier L, Horsley T, Welch V, Cogo E, Antony J, Straus S. What is the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to conduct a review? Protocol for a scoping review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:114. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-114. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources