Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul-Aug;19(4):463-467.
doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.175787.

Influence of age on seven putative prostate tumor markers: a cohort study in Chinese men

Affiliations

Influence of age on seven putative prostate tumor markers: a cohort study in Chinese men

Wei-Gui Sun et al. Asian J Androl. 2017 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

The accuracy and sensitivity of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for prostate cancer diagnosis is often poor; however, the reasons for its inaccuracy have rarely been investigated, especially with respect to age. In this study, 476 healthy males, aged 10-89 years, were stratified into eight age groups, and levels of seven markers were determined: total PSA (tPSA), free PSA (fPSA), %fPSA, isoform [-2]proPSA (p2PSA), p2PSA/tPSA, %p2PSA, and the prostate health index (PHI). Both tPSA and fPSA levels increased with age. The tPSA level was highest (1.39 ng ml-1) at 70-79 years; %fPSA was highest (0.57 ng ml-1) at 10-19 years; and %p2PSA was lowest (18.33 ng ml-1) at 40-49 years. Both p2PSA and p2PSA/tPSA had relatively flat curves and showed no correlation with age (P = 0.222). PHI was a sensitive age-associated marker (P < 0.05), with two peaks and one trough. The coverage rates and radiance graphs of PHI and %p2PSA were more distinctive than those of tPSA and the other markers. In subjects older than 69 years, PHI and %p2PSA both began to decrease, approximately 10 years earlier than the decrease in tPSA. Our results suggest that the clinical diagnosis of prostate cancer using PSA should be investigated more comprehensively based on patient age. Moreover, %p2PSA and PHI could be considered as earlier markers that may be more suitable than PSA alone.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The age distribution and eight groups.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The age-related distribution curves of PSA (a), p2PSA (b) and PHI (c).
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) The relationships between PSA and ages. (b) The outstanding clinical values of tPSA. (c) The relationships between PHI, p2PSA and ages. (d) The potential clinical values of PHI.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tosoian JJ, Ross AE, Sokoll LJ, Partin AW, Pavlovich CP. Urinary biomarkers for prostate cancer. Urol Clin North Am. 2016;43:17–38. - PubMed
    1. Huang YQ, Sun T, Zhong WD, Wu CL. Clinical performance of serum [-2]proPSA derivatives, %p2PSA and PHI, in the detection and management of prostate cancer. Am J Clin Exp Urol. 2014;2:343–50. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Loeb S. Time to replace prostate-specific antigen (PSA) with the prostate health index (PHI)? Yet more evidence that the PHI consistently outperforms PSA across diverse populations. BJU Int. 2015;115:500. - PubMed
    1. Mirandola L, Figueroa JA, Phan TT, Grizzi F, Kim M, et al. Novel antigens in non-small cell lung cancer: SP17, AKAP4, and PTTG1 are potential immunotherapeutic targets. Oncotarget. 2015;6:2812–26. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee AG, Choi YH, Cho SY, Cho IR. A prospective study of reducing unnecessary prostate biopsy in patients with high serum prostate-specific antigen with consideration of prostatic inflammation. Korean J Urol. 2012;53:50–3. - PMC - PubMed

Substances