Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr 5;24(4):502-508.
doi: 10.1016/j.str.2016.02.017.

Outcome of the First wwPDB/CCDC/D3R Ligand Validation Workshop

Affiliations

Outcome of the First wwPDB/CCDC/D3R Ligand Validation Workshop

Paul D Adams et al. Structure. .

Abstract

Crystallographic studies of ligands bound to biological macromolecules (proteins and nucleic acids) represent an important source of information concerning drug-target interactions, providing atomic level insights into the physical chemistry of complex formation between macromolecules and ligands. Of the more than 115,000 entries extant in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) archive, ∼75% include at least one non-polymeric ligand. Ligand geometrical and stereochemical quality, the suitability of ligand models for in silico drug discovery and design, and the goodness-of-fit of ligand models to electron-density maps vary widely across the archive. We describe the proceedings and conclusions from the first Worldwide PDB/Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center/Drug Design Data Resource (wwPDB/CCDC/D3R) Ligand Validation Workshop held at the Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics at Rutgers University on July 30-31, 2015. Experts in protein crystallography from academe and industry came together with non-profit and for-profit software providers for crystallography and with experts in computational chemistry and data archiving to discuss and make recommendations on best practices, as framed by a series of questions central to structural studies of macromolecule-ligand complexes. What data concerning bound ligands should be archived in the PDB? How should the ligands be best represented? How should structural models of macromolecule-ligand complexes be validated? What supplementary information should accompany publications of structural studies of biological macromolecules? Consensus recommendations on best practices developed in response to each of these questions are provided, together with some details regarding implementation. Important issues addressed but not resolved at the workshop are also enumerated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Example highlighting the value of presenting ligand electron density model fit and geometrical analysis from CCDC Mogul from the Global Phasing Buster Report (PDB ID: 2H7P, later superseded by entry 4TZT (He et al., 2006); CCD ID: 468).

References

    1. Berman HM, Henrick K, Nakamura H. Announcing the worldwide Protein Data Bank. Nat Struct Biol. 2003;10:980. - PubMed
    1. Bhat TN. Calculation of an OMIT map. J. Appl. Cryst. 1988;21:279–281.
    1. Bhat TN, Cohen GH. OMITMAP - An Electron-Density Map Suitable For The Examination Of Errors In a Macromolecular Model. J. Appl. Cryst. 1984;17:244–248.
    1. Bruno IJ, Cole JC, Kessler M, Luo J, Motherwell WD, Purkis LH, Smith BR, Taylor R, Cooper RI, Harris SE, et al. Retrieval of crystallographically-derived molecular geometry information. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004;44:2133–2144. - PubMed
    1. Caboche S, Pupin M, Leclere V, Fontaine A, Jacques P, Kucherov G. NORINE: a database of nonribosomal peptides. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:D326–D331. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types