Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016:2016:7575239.
doi: 10.1155/2016/7575239. Epub 2016 Mar 9.

Distribution of Heavy Metals in the Soils Associated with the Commonly Used Pesticides in Cotton Fields

Affiliations

Distribution of Heavy Metals in the Soils Associated with the Commonly Used Pesticides in Cotton Fields

Saadia Rashid Tariq et al. Scientifica (Cairo). 2016.

Abstract

Agricultural soils contain both heavy metals and pesticides originating from various agricultural practices. It is quite important to study the relationships between these two classes of compounds. To accomplish this, 52 soil samples were collected from cotton fields and analyzed for their metal contents (Ni, Cu, Co, Pb, Cr, and Cd) and levels of most commonly used pesticides (imidacloprid, acetamiprid, and emamectin). FAAS was used for metal estimation and the pesticides were determined by HPLC equipped with UV detector. The results of the study revealed slightly enhanced levels of Ni and Cd in these samples while the rest of the metals were present within tolerable range. Acetamiprid residues in soil were strongly positively correlated with Cu and negatively correlated with Cr. Similarly, imidacloprid in soil was negatively correlated with Ni. Thus it was evidenced that Cu stabilizes acetamiprid while Cr and Ni facilitate the degradation of acetamiprid and imidacloprid in the soil.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Location map of sampling sites.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Box and Whisker plots for the distribution of various parameters in soil.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cluster analysis for the determination of various parameters.

References

    1. Cloyd R. A., Bethke J. A. Impact of neonicotinoid insecticides on natural enemies in greenhouse and interiorscape environments. Pest Management Science. 2011;67(1):3–9. doi: 10.1002/ps.2015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Khaliq P., Hashmi L. A., Qazi M. H. Agriculture and environment. Progress Farming. 1995;15:16–23.
    1. Shiraishi H., Pula F., Otsuki A., Iwakuma T. Behaviour of pesticides in Lake Kasumugaura, Japan. Science of the Total Environment. 1988;72:29–42.
    1. Rial Otero R., Cancho Grande B., Arias Estévez M., López Periago E., Simal Gándara J. Procedure for the measurement of soil inputs of plant-protection agents washed off through vineyard canopy by rainfall. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2003;51(17):5041–5046. doi: 10.1021/jf034417a. - DOI - PubMed
    1. van der Werf H. M. G. Assessing the impact of pesticides on the environment. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 1996;60(2-3):81–96. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8809(96)01096-1. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources