Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2017 Dec;24(8):1062-1079.
doi: 10.1177/1073191116640355. Epub 2016 Apr 6.

Examining the Factor Structure of the Self-Report of Psychopathy Short-Form Across Four Young Adult Samples

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Examining the Factor Structure of the Self-Report of Psychopathy Short-Form Across Four Young Adult Samples

Hailey L Dotterer et al. Assessment. 2017 Dec.

Abstract

Psychopathy refers to a range of complex behaviors and personality traits, including callousness and antisocial behavior, typically studied in criminal populations. Recent studies have used self-reports to examine psychopathic traits among noncriminal samples. The goal of the current study was to examine the underlying factor structure of the Self-Report of Psychopathy Scale-Short Form (SRP-SF) across complementary samples and examine the impact of gender on factor structure. We examined the structure of the SRP-SF among 2,554 young adults from three undergraduate samples and a high-risk young adult sample. Using confirmatory factor analysis, a four-correlated factor model and a four-bifactor model showed good fit to the data. Evidence of weak invariance was found for both models across gender. These findings highlight that the SRP-SF is a useful measure of low-level psychopathic traits in noncriminal samples, although the underlying factor structure may not fully translate across men and women.

Keywords: antisocial behavior; bifactor; gender; invariance; psychometric; sample.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Four-correlated factor model. Note. *** p < .001. The full items could not be reproduced here, because they are copyrighted by Multi-Health Systems, Inc. Instead, we provide a paraphrased indication of the item content.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Four-bifactor model. Note. Paraphrased indications of item content are presented.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Babiak P, Neumann CS, Hare RD. Corporate psychopathy: Talking the walk. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 2010;28(2):174–193. doi:10.1002/bsl.925. - PubMed
    1. Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin. 1990;107(2):238. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238. - PubMed
    1. Blair RJR. The amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex: Functional contributions and dysfunction in psychopathy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 2008;363(1503):2557–2565. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0027. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bolt DM, Hare RD, Vitale JE, Newman JP. A multigroup item response theory analysis of the psychopathy checklist-revised. Psychological Assessment. 2004;16(2):155–168. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.16.2.155. - PubMed
    1. Brannick MT. Critical comments on applying covariance structure modeling. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 1995;16(3):201–213. doi:10.1002/job.4030160303.

LinkOut - more resources