Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Jul;14(7):855-69.
doi: 10.1080/14779072.2016.1176528. Epub 2016 Apr 25.

Epidemiology of cardiovascular disease: recent novel outlooks on risk factors and clinical approaches

Affiliations
Review

Epidemiology of cardiovascular disease: recent novel outlooks on risk factors and clinical approaches

Teemu J Niiranen et al. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2016 Jul.

Abstract

Introduction: Cardiovascular (CVD) risk assessment with traditional risk factors (age, sex, blood pressure, lipids, smoking and diabetes) has remained relatively invariant over the past decades despite some inaccuracies associated with this approach. However, the search for novel, robust and cost-effective risk markers of CVD risk is ongoing.

Areas covered: A large share of the major developments in CVD risk prediction during the past five years has been made in large-scale biomarker discovery and the so called 'omics' - the rapidly growing fields of genomics, transcriptomics, epigenetics and metabolomics. This review focuses on how these new technologies are helping drive primary CVD risk estimation forward in recent years, and speculates on how they could be utilized more effectively for discovering novel risk factors in the future. Expert commentary: The search for new CVD risk factors is currently undergoing a significant revolution as the simple relationship between single risk factors and disease will have to be replaced by models that strive to integrate the whole field of omics into medicine.

Keywords: Cardiovascular risk; biomarkers; cardiovascular disease; epigenetics; genomics; metabolomics; risk factors; transcriptomics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Concepts of two metrics for evaluating improvement in discrimination when a new risk factor (RF) is added to an existing model: 1) improvement in c-statistic (the proportion of pairs in which the person who experienced the event had a higher predicted probability of experiencing the event than the subject who did not experience the event) and 2) net reclassification index, the percentage of persons with and without the event correctly reclassified.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Principles of a randomized controlled trial and Mendelian randomization.

References

    1. Goff DC, Lloyd-Jones DM, Bennett G, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129:S49–73. - PubMed
    1. Kannel WB, Dawber TR, Kagan A, et al. Factors of risk in the development of coronary heart disease--six year follow-up experience. The Framingham Study. Ann Intern Med. 1961;55:33–50. - PubMed
    1. Ladapo JA, Goldfeld KS. Statistical uncertainty in 10-year Framingham risk of coronary heart disease and cardiovascular disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:377–8. - PubMed
    1. Bitton A, Gaziano TA. The Framingham Heart Study's impact on global risk assessment. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2010;53:68–78. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Taylor F, Huffman MD, Macedo AF, et al. Statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;1:CD004816. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources