Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2016 May 3;7(18):26888-97.
doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8590.

Combined gemcitabine and S-1 chemotherapy for treating unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a randomized open-label clinical trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Combined gemcitabine and S-1 chemotherapy for treating unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a randomized open-label clinical trial

Hao Li et al. Oncotarget. .

Abstract

Although the combination of cisplatin and gemcitabine (GEM) is considered the standard first-line chemotherapy against unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC), its efficacy is discouraging. The present randomized open-label clinical trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the GEM plus S-1 (GEM-S-1) combination against unresectable HC. Twenty-five patients per group were randomly assigned to receive GEM, S-1 or GEM-S-1. Neutropenia (56%) and leukopenia (40%) were the most common chemotherapy-related toxicities in the GEM-S-1 group. Median overall survival (OS) in the GEM-S-1, GEM and S-1 groups was 11, 10 and 6 months, respectively. GEM plus S-1 significantly improved OS compared to S-1 monotherapy (OR=0.68; 95%CI, 0.50-0.90; P=0.008). Median progression-free survival (PFS) times in the GEM-S-1, GEM and S-1 groups were 4.90, 3.70 and 1.60 months, respectively. GEM plus S-1 significantly improved PFS compared to S-1 monotherapy (OR=0.50; 95%CI, 0.27-0.91; P=0.024). Response rates were 36%, 24% and 8% in the GEM-S-1, GEM and S-1 groups, respectively. A statistically significant difference was found in response rates between the gemcitabine-S-1 and S-1 groups (36% vs 8%, P=0.017). Patients with CA19-9<466 U/ml were more responsive to chemotherapeutic agents than those with CA19-9≥571 U/ml (88.9% vs 0%, P<0.001). We conclude that the combination of GEM plus S-1 provides a better OS, PFS and response rate than S-1 monotherapy, but it did not significantly differ from GEM monotherapy. (ChiCTR-TRC-14004733).

Keywords: CA19-9; S-1; chemotherapy; gemcitabine; hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Patient selection flow chart
Seventy-five out of 79 patients completed the analysis, including 25 each in the GEM, S-1 and GEM-S-1 groups. GEM, gemcitabine; GEM-S-1, gemcitabine plus S-1.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier curves of OS according to treatment group
GEM, gemcitabine; GEM-S-1, gemcitabine plus S-1; 95%CI, 95% confidence interval.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier curves of PFS according to treatment group
GEM, gemcitabine; GEM-S-1, gemcitabine plus S-1; 95%CI, 95% confidence interval.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. LaFemina J, Jarnagin WR. Surgical management of proximal bile duct cancers. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012;397:869–879. - PubMed
    1. Zhou NX, Huang ZQ, Liu YX. Analyses were conducted in 1098 patients with biliary tract cancer within the national surveys. Chin J Surg. 1990;28:516–520. - PubMed
    1. Benson AB, Bekaii-Saab T, Ben-Josef E, Blumgart L, Clary BM, Curley SA, Davila R, Earle CC, Ensminger WD, Gibbs JF, Laheru D, Langnas AN, Mulvihill SJ, et al. Hepatobiliary cancers. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2006;4:728–750. - PubMed
    1. Eckmann KR, Patel DK, Landgraf A, Slade JH, Lin E, Kaur H, Loyer E, Weatherly JM, Javle M. Chemotherapy outcomes for the treatment of unresectable intrahepatic and hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a retrospective analysis. Gastrointest Cancer Res. 2011;4:155–160. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Valle J, Wasan H, Palmer DH, Cunningham D, Anthoney A, Maraveyas A, Madhusudan S, Iveson T, Hughes S, Pereira SP, Roughton M, Bridgewater J, ABC-02 Trial Investigators Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1273–1281. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms