Combined gemcitabine and S-1 chemotherapy for treating unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a randomized open-label clinical trial
- PMID: 27058753
- PMCID: PMC5042023
- DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.8590
Combined gemcitabine and S-1 chemotherapy for treating unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a randomized open-label clinical trial
Abstract
Although the combination of cisplatin and gemcitabine (GEM) is considered the standard first-line chemotherapy against unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC), its efficacy is discouraging. The present randomized open-label clinical trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the GEM plus S-1 (GEM-S-1) combination against unresectable HC. Twenty-five patients per group were randomly assigned to receive GEM, S-1 or GEM-S-1. Neutropenia (56%) and leukopenia (40%) were the most common chemotherapy-related toxicities in the GEM-S-1 group. Median overall survival (OS) in the GEM-S-1, GEM and S-1 groups was 11, 10 and 6 months, respectively. GEM plus S-1 significantly improved OS compared to S-1 monotherapy (OR=0.68; 95%CI, 0.50-0.90; P=0.008). Median progression-free survival (PFS) times in the GEM-S-1, GEM and S-1 groups were 4.90, 3.70 and 1.60 months, respectively. GEM plus S-1 significantly improved PFS compared to S-1 monotherapy (OR=0.50; 95%CI, 0.27-0.91; P=0.024). Response rates were 36%, 24% and 8% in the GEM-S-1, GEM and S-1 groups, respectively. A statistically significant difference was found in response rates between the gemcitabine-S-1 and S-1 groups (36% vs 8%, P=0.017). Patients with CA19-9<466 U/ml were more responsive to chemotherapeutic agents than those with CA19-9≥571 U/ml (88.9% vs 0%, P<0.001). We conclude that the combination of GEM plus S-1 provides a better OS, PFS and response rate than S-1 monotherapy, but it did not significantly differ from GEM monotherapy. (ChiCTR-TRC-14004733).
Keywords: CA19-9; S-1; chemotherapy; gemcitabine; hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Figures



Similar articles
-
A Multicenter Phase II Study of Gemcitabine plus S-1 Chemotherapy for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer.Anticancer Res. 2017 Feb;37(2):909-914. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.11398. Anticancer Res. 2017. PMID: 28179351 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and safety of S-1 following gemcitabine with cisplatin for advanced biliary tract cancer.Invest New Drugs. 2021 Oct;39(5):1399-1404. doi: 10.1007/s10637-021-01098-2. Epub 2021 Apr 9. Invest New Drugs. 2021. PMID: 33835357 Free PMC article.
-
Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin Chemotherapy Prolongs the Survival in Advanced Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A Large Multicenter Study.Am J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jun;43(6):422-427. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000682. Am J Clin Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32118610
-
Gemcitabine and S-1 combination chemotherapy versus gemcitabine alone for locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in Asia.J Chemother. 2015 Aug;27(4):227-34. doi: 10.1179/1973947815Y.0000000013. Epub 2015 Mar 20. J Chemother. 2015. PMID: 25790948
-
S-1 monotherapy versus S-1 combination therapy in gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer: A meta-analysis (PRISMA) of randomized control trials.Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jul;96(30):e7611. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007611. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017. PMID: 28746215 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Accurate resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma using eOrganmap 3D reconstruction and full quantization technique.World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Aug 27;15(8):1693-1702. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i8.1693. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023. PMID: 37701684 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and Safety of First-Line Chemotherapies for Patients With Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Front Oncol. 2021 Sep 28;11:736113. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.736113. eCollection 2021. Front Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34650920 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative efficacy of targeted therapy, chemotherapy and their combination for advanced cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.PeerJ. 2025 May 14;13:e19386. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19386. eCollection 2025. PeerJ. 2025. PMID: 40386239 Free PMC article.
-
Systemic review of the robustness of randomized controlled trials for the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma in three domains: survival-inferred fragility index, restricted mean survival time, and the spin effect.Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2022 Dec;11(6):861-869. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-21-118. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2022. PMID: 36523938 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma with High Microsatellite Instability and Tumor Mutation Burden That Responded Significantly to Pembrolizumab but Perforated within a Short Period.Intern Med. 2024 Apr 15;63(8):1105-1112. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.1492-22. Epub 2023 Sep 29. Intern Med. 2024. PMID: 37779076 Free PMC article.
References
-
- LaFemina J, Jarnagin WR. Surgical management of proximal bile duct cancers. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012;397:869–879. - PubMed
-
- Zhou NX, Huang ZQ, Liu YX. Analyses were conducted in 1098 patients with biliary tract cancer within the national surveys. Chin J Surg. 1990;28:516–520. - PubMed
-
- Benson AB, Bekaii-Saab T, Ben-Josef E, Blumgart L, Clary BM, Curley SA, Davila R, Earle CC, Ensminger WD, Gibbs JF, Laheru D, Langnas AN, Mulvihill SJ, et al. Hepatobiliary cancers. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2006;4:728–750. - PubMed
-
- Valle J, Wasan H, Palmer DH, Cunningham D, Anthoney A, Maraveyas A, Madhusudan S, Iveson T, Hughes S, Pereira SP, Roughton M, Bridgewater J, ABC-02 Trial Investigators Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1273–1281. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials