Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Mar 31:7:35.
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2016.00035. eCollection 2016.

Magnetoencephalography in Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation

Affiliations
Review

Magnetoencephalography in Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation

Andrea Paggiaro et al. Front Neurol. .

Abstract

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a non-invasive neurophysiological technique used to study the cerebral cortex. Currently, MEG is mainly used clinically to localize epileptic foci and eloquent brain areas in order to avoid damage during neurosurgery. MEG might, however, also be of help in monitoring stroke recovery and rehabilitation. This review focuses on experimental use of MEG in neurorehabilitation. MEG has been employed to detect early modifications in neuroplasticity and connectivity, but there is insufficient evidence as to whether these methods are sensitive enough to be used as a clinical diagnostic test. MEG has also been exploited to derive the relationship between brain activity and movement kinematics for a motor-based brain-computer interface. In the current body of experimental research, MEG appears to be a powerful tool in neurorehabilitation, but it is necessary to produce new data to confirm its clinical utility.

Keywords: brain–computer interface; connectivity; magnetoencephalography; rehabilitation; stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Example of a trial for sensorimotor rhythm (SMR) modulation through grasping imagery training. Whole-head magnetoencephalography data were continuously recorded throughout each training block [Buch et al. (32)].
Figure 2
Figure 2
MEG-BCI: hand orthosis controlled by ipsilesional central mu-rhythm [modified from Birbaumer and Cohen (114)].
Figure 3
Figure 3
Brain–machine Interface in paralyzed chronic stroke patients’ rehabilitation. User wearing an EEG system with the hand attached to the orthosis to drive extending fingers. The sensorimotor rhythm power recorded from the ipsilesional electrodes (gray line) is translated into movement of the orthosis [modified from Ramos-Murguialday et al. (84)].

References

    1. Stefan H, Hummel C, Scheler G, Genow A, Druschky K, Tilz C, et al. Magnetic brain source imaging of focal epileptic activity: a synopsis of 455 cases. Brain (2003) 126:2396–405.10.1093/brain/awg239 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Knowlton RC, Razdan SN, Limdi N, Elgavish RA, Killen J, Blount J, et al. Effect of epilepsy magnetic source imaging on intracranial electrode placement. Ann Neurol (2009) 65:716–23.10.1002/ana.21660 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hari R, Kujala MV. Brain basis of human social interaction: from concepts to brain imaging. Physiol Rev (2009) 89:453–79.10.1152/physrev.00041.2007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wilson HS. Continuous head-localization and data correction in a whole-cortex MEG sensor. Neurol Clin Neurophysiol (2004) 2004:56.10.1016/j.ics.2007.02.051 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gavaret M, Badier JM, Marquis P, Bartolomei F, Chauvel P. Electric source imaging in temporal lobe epilepsy. J Clin Neurophysiol (2004) 21:267–82.10.1097/01.WNP.0000139929.06455.82 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources