Differences in marital status and mortality by race/ethnicity and nativity among California cancer patients
- PMID: 27065455
- PMCID: PMC5523959
- DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29886
Differences in marital status and mortality by race/ethnicity and nativity among California cancer patients
Abstract
Background: It has been observed that married cancer patients have lower mortality rates than unmarried patients, but data for different racial/ethnic groups are scarce. The authors examined the risk of overall mortality associated with marital status across racial/ethnic groups and sex in data from the California Cancer Registry.
Methods: California Cancer Registry data for all first primary invasive cancers diagnosed from 2000 through 2009 for the 10 most common sites of cancer-related death for non-Hispanic whites (NHWs), blacks, Asians/Pacific Islanders (APIs), and Hispanics were used to estimate multivariable hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for marital status in relation to overall mortality by race/ethnicity and sex. The study cohort included 393,470 male and 389,697 female cancer patients and 204,007 and 182,600 deaths from all causes, respectively, through December 31, 2012.
Results: All-cause mortality was higher in unmarried patients than in married patients, but there was significant variation by race/ethnicity. Adjusted HRs (95% CIs) ranged from 1.24 (95% CI, 1.23-1.26) in NHWs to 1.11 (95% CI, 1.07-1.15) in APIs among males and from 1.17 (95% CI, 1.15-1.18) in NHWs to 1.07 (95% CI, 1.04-1.11) in APIs among females. All-cause mortality associated with unmarried status compared with married status was higher in US-born API and Hispanic men and women relative to their foreign-born counterparts.
Conclusions: For patients who have the cancers that contribute most to mortality, being unmarried is associated with worse overall survival compared with being married, with up to 24% higher mortality among NHW males but only 6% higher mortality among foreign-born Hispanic and API females. Future research should pursue the identification of factors underlying these associations to inform targeted interventions for unmarried cancer patients. Cancer 2016;122:1570-8. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
Keywords: marriage; mortality; nativity; neighborhood socioeconomic status; race/ethnicity.
© 2016 American Cancer Society.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Christina A. Clarke reports grants from Genentech outside the submitted work.
Comment in
-
Being a widower may be an indication for routine prostate-specific antigen screening above age 69 years, which the American Urological Association recommends as a cutoff point.Cancer. 2016 Aug 15;122(16):2604. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30098. Epub 2016 Jun 10. Cancer. 2016. PMID: 27284681 No abstract available.
-
Reply to being a widower may be an indication for routine prostate-specific antigen screening above age 69 years, which the American Urological Association recommends as a cutoff point.Cancer. 2016 Aug 15;122(16):2604-6. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30097. Epub 2016 Jun 10. Cancer. 2016. PMID: 27286520 No abstract available.
References
-
- Inverso G, Mahal BA, Aizer AA, Donoff RB, Chau NG, Haddad RI. Marital status and head and neck cancer outcomes. Cancer. 2015;121:1273–1278. - PubMed
-
- Wang L, Wilson SE, Stewart DB, Hollenbeak CS. Marital status and colon cancer outcomes in US Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registries: does marriage affect cancer survival by gender and stage? Cancer Epidemiol. 2011;35:417–422. - PubMed
-
- Chang SM, Barker FG., 2nd Marital status, treatment, and survival in patients with glioblastoma multiforme: a population based study. Cancer. 2005;104:1975–1984. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
