Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr 11;6(4):e010412.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010412.

Research priorities for shoulder surgery: results of the 2015 James Lind Alliance patient and clinician priority setting partnership

Amar Rangan  1 , Sheela Upadhaya  2 , Sandra Regan  3 , Francine Toye  4 , Jonathan L Rees  5
Affiliations

Research priorities for shoulder surgery: results of the 2015 James Lind Alliance patient and clinician priority setting partnership

Amar Rangan et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: To run a UK based James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership for 'Surgery for Common Shoulder Problems'.

Setting: This was a nationally funded and conducted process. It was organised from a musculoskeletal research centre and Biomedical Research Unit in Oxford.

Participants: UK shoulder patients, carers and clinicians, involved in treating patients with shoulder pain and shoulder problems that might require surgery.

Interventions: These were national electronic and paper surveys capturing treatment uncertainties that are important to shoulder patients, carers and clinicians.

Outcome measures: The outcomes relevant to this study were the survey results and rankings.

Results: The process took 18 months to complete, with 371 participants contributing 404 in scope questions. The James Lind process then produced a final 10 research priorities and uncertainties that relate to the scope of 'Surgery for Common Shoulder Problems'.

Conclusions: The final top 10 UK research priorities have been produced and are now being disseminated to partner organisations and funders to guide funding of shoulder research for the next 5-10 years on topics that are important to patients, their carers and clinicians.

Keywords: James Lind Alliance; SURGERY; uncertainties.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of priority setting partnership process indicating the number of questions at each stage.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. 2015. The JamesLind Alliance Guidebook. http://www.jla.nihr.ac.uk/guidebook.
    1. Jordan KP, Kadam UT, Hayward R et al. . Annual consultation prevalence of regional musculoskeletal problems in primary care: an observational study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010;11:144 10.1186/1471-2474-11-144 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Linsell L, Dawson J, Zondervan K et al. . Prevalence and incidence of adults consulting for shoulder conditions in UK primary care; patterns of diagnosis and referral. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2006;45:215–21. 10.1093/rheumatology/kei139 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Luime JJ, Koes BW, Hendriksen IJ et al. . Prevalence and incidence of shoulder pain in the general population; a systematic review. Scand J Rheumatol 2004;33:73–81. 10.1080/03009740310004667 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Judge A, Murphy RJ, Maxwell R et al. . Temporal trends and geographical variation in the use of subacromial decompression and rotator cuff repair of the shoulder in England. Bone Joint J 2014;96-b:70–4. 10.1302/0301-620X.96B1.32556 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types