Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2016 Apr 11;6(4):e010991.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010991.

Lung-protective ventilation initiated in the emergency department (LOV-ED): a study protocol for a quasi-experimental, before-after trial aimed at reducing pulmonary complications

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Lung-protective ventilation initiated in the emergency department (LOV-ED): a study protocol for a quasi-experimental, before-after trial aimed at reducing pulmonary complications

Brian M Fuller et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: In critically ill patients, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and ventilator-associated conditions (VACs) are associated with increased mortality, survivor morbidity and healthcare resource utilisation. Studies conclusively demonstrate that initial ventilator settings in patients with ARDS, and at risk for it, impact outcome. No studies have been conducted in the emergency department (ED) to determine if lung-protective ventilation in patients at risk for ARDS can reduce its incidence. Since the ED is the entry point to the intensive care unit for hundreds of thousands of mechanically ventilated patients annually in the USA, this represents a knowledge gap in this arena. A lung-protective ventilation strategy was instituted in our ED in 2014. It aims to address the parameters in need of quality improvement, as demonstrated by our previous research: (1) prevention of volutrauma; (2) appropriate positive end-expiratory pressure setting; (3) prevention of hyperoxia; and (4) aspiration precautions.

Methods and analysis: The lung-protective ventilation initiated in the emergency department (LOV-ED) trial is a single-centre, quasi-experimental before-after study testing the hypothesis that lung-protective ventilation, initiated in the ED, is associated with reduced pulmonary complications. An intervention cohort of 513 mechanically ventilated adult ED patients will be compared with over 1000 preintervention control patients. The primary outcome is a composite outcome of pulmonary complications after admission (ARDS and VACs). Multivariable logistic regression with propensity score adjustment will test the hypothesis that ED lung-protective ventilation decreases the incidence of pulmonary complications.

Ethics and dissemination: Approval of the study was obtained prior to data collection on the first patient. As the study is a before-after observational study, examining the effect of treatment changes over time, it is being conducted with waiver of informed consent. This work will be disseminated by publication of full-length manuscripts, presentation in abstract form at major scientific meetings and data sharing with other investigators through academically established means.

Trial registration number: NCT02543554.

Keywords: ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY MEDICINE; ARDS; mechanical ventilation; ventilator-associated conditions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic of before-after trial design.
Figure 2
Figure 2
ED protocol for mechanical ventilation in the immediate postintubation period. ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; ED, emergency department; PBW, predicted body weight; PEEP, positive end-expiratory pressure; BMI, body mass index; FiO2, fraction of inspired oxygen; SpO2, peripheral oxygen saturation; PaO2, partial pressure of arterial oxygen; iPEEP, intrinsic PEEP.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Planned operations for intervention study period (after group). ED, emergency department; ICU, intensive care unit; LOS, length of stay; VAC, ventilator-associated condition; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome.

References

    1. Boyer AF, Schoenberg N, Babcock H et al. . A prospective evaluation of ventilator-associated conditions and infection-related ventilator-associated conditions. Chest 2015;147:68–81. 10.1378/chest.14-0544 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fuller BM, Mohr NM, Drewry AM et al. . Lower tidal volume at initiation of mechanical ventilation may reduce progression to acute respiratory distress syndrome-a systematic review. Crit Care 2013;17:R11 10.1186/cc11936 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rubenfeld GD, Caldwell E, Peabody E et al. . Incidence and outcomes of acute lung injury. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1685–93. 10.1056/NEJMoa050333 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Easter BD, Fischer C, Fisher J. The use of mechanical ventilation in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 2012;30:1183–8. 10.1016/j.ajem.2011.09.008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dreyfuss D, Soler P, Basset G et al. . High inflation pressure pulmonary edema: respective effects of high airway pressure, high tidal volume, and positive end-expiratory pressure. Am Rev Respir Dis 1988;137:1159–64. 10.1164/ajrccm/137.5.1159 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data