Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Apr 15;44(2):356-62.
doi: 10.1042/BST20150251.

SHP-1: the next checkpoint target for cancer immunotherapy?

Affiliations
Review

SHP-1: the next checkpoint target for cancer immunotherapy?

H Angharad Watson et al. Biochem Soc Trans. .

Abstract

The immense power of the immune system is harnessed in healthy individuals by a range of negative regulatory signals and checkpoints. Manipulating these checkpoints through inhibition has resulted in striking immune-mediated clearance of otherwise untreatable tumours and metastases; unfortunately, not all patients respond to treatment with the currently available inhibitors of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1). Combinatorial studies using both anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 demonstrate synergistic effects of targeting multiple checkpoints, paving the way for other immune checkpoints to be targeted. Src homology 2 domain-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase 1 (SHP-1) is a widely expressed inhibitory protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTP). In T-cells, it is a negative regulator of antigen-dependent activation and proliferation. It is a cytosolic protein, and therefore not amenable to antibody-mediated therapies, but its role in activation and proliferation makes it an attractive target for genetic manipulation in adoptive transfer strategies, such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells. This review will discuss the potential value of SHP-1 inhibition in future tumour immunotherapy.

Keywords: SHP-1; adoptive cell transfer; checkpoint inhibitors; protein tyrosine phosphatase inhibition; tumour immunotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. SHP-1 mediated inhibition of TCR signalling
SHP-1 is constitutively associated with the inhibitory receptor LAIR-1, which, in turn, is constitutively phosphorylated by Lck [74], although SHP-1 may also be activated by other ITIM-containing inhibitory receptors. Activation of SHP-1 allows it to inhibit antigen-induced TCR signalling either through direct dephosphorylation of the TCRζ chain, or dephosphorylation of downstream adaptor proteins such as Lck and ZAP70. Activating phosphate groups are shown as stars.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Lowered activation thresholds, increased duration of interaction with antigen presenting cells (green) and increased expansion of SHP-1−/− CD8 T-cells are beneficial in tumour therapy
(1a) Tumour antigens (grey) are low affinity and poorly immunogenic, and offer limited stimulation to naïve T-cells (purple). (1b) Low numbers of tumour specific effector T-cells (red) are insufficient to control tumour growth. (2a) SHP-1−/− T-cells have lower activation thresholds, therefore can be stimulated by low-affinity antigens. (2b) In response to antigen stimulation SHP-1−/− T-cells proliferate more than WT T-cells, leading to increased numbers of tumour specific effector T-cells, and predicted control of tumour growth.

References

    1. Yuan J., Gnjatic S., Li H., Powel S., Gallardo H.F., Ritter E., Ku G.Y., Jungbluth A.A., Segal N.H., Rasalan T.S., et al. CTLA-4 blockade enhances polyfunctional NY-ESO-1 specific T cell responses in metastatic melanoma patients with clinical benefit. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008;105:20410–20415. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0810114105. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hodi F.S., Butler M., Oble D.A., Seiden M.V., Haluska F.G., Kruse A., MacRae S., Nelson M., Canning C., Lowy I., et al. Immunologic and clinical effects of antibody blockade of cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 in previously vaccinated cancer patients. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008;105:3005–3010. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0712237105. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brahmer J.R., Drake C.G., Wollner I., Powderly J.D., Picus J., Sharfman W.H., Stankevich E., Pons A., Salay T.M., McMiller T.L., et al. Phase I study of single-agent anti-programmed death-1 (MDX-1106) in refractory solid tumors: safety, clinical activity, pharmacodynamics, and immunologic correlates. J. Clin. Oncol. 2010;28:3167–3175. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.7609. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Droeser R.A., Hirt C., Viehl C.T., Frey D.M., Nebiker C., Huber X., Zlobec I., Eppenberger-Castori S., Tzankov A., Rosso R., et al. Clinical impact of programmed cell death ligand 1 expression in colorectal cancer. Eur. J. Cancer. 2013;49:2233–2242. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.02.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Avril T., Saikali S., Vauleon E., Jary A., Hamlat A., De Tayrac M., Mosser J., Quillien V. Distinct effects of human glioblastoma immunoregulatory molecules programmed cell death ligand-1 (PDL-1) and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) on tumour-specific T cell functions. J. Neuroimmunol. 2010;225:22–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2010.04.003. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances