Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016:10:87-104.
doi: 10.1007/s11569-016-0253-6. Epub 2016 Mar 3.

What Ethics for Bioart?

Affiliations

What Ethics for Bioart?

Nora S Vaage. Nanoethics. 2016.

Abstract

Living artworks created with biotechnology raise a range of ethical questions, some of which are unprecedented, others well known from other contexts. These questions are often discussed within the framework of bioethics, the ethics of the life sciences. The basic concern of institutionalised bioethics is to develop and implement ethical guidelines for ethically responsible handling of living material in technological and scientific contexts. Notably, discussions of ethical issues in bioart do not refer to existing discourses on art and morality from the field of aesthetics. The latter framework is primarily concerned with how the moral value of an artwork affects its artistic value. The author argues that a successful integration of these two frameworks will make possible an ethics of bioart that is adequate to its subject matter and relevant for practice. Such an integrated approach can give increased depth to understandings of ethical issues in bioart, inspire new ways of thinking about ethics in relation to art in general and give novel impulses to bioethics and technology assessment. Artworks by the Tissue Culture and Art Project and their reception serve as the empirical starting point for connecting perspectives in art with those of bioethics, developing an ethics for bioart. The author suggests that consideration of the effect of these artworks is vital in validating ethically problematical applications of biotechnology for art. It is argued that the affective, visceral qualities of living artworks may spur the audience to adjust, revise or develop their personal ethical framework.

Keywords: Art and morality; Bioart; Bioethics; Tissue culture and art project; Validation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Tissue Culture and Art Project, Pig Wings, 2000–2001. Pig mesenchymal cells (bone marrow stem cells) grown over biodegradable polymers. a Photographed under coloured light: red bat wings, blue bird wings and green pterosaur wings. b The “bat” (left) and “bird” (right) wings in their culture vessels. Photo credits: Tissue Culture and Art Project. Reproduced with permission from the artists
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Tissue Culture and Art Project, Extra Ear ¼ Size, 2003. Photo credits: Tissue Culture and Art Project. Reproduced with permission from the artists
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Eduardo Kac, GFP Bunny, 2000. Photo credits: Chrystelle Fontaine
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Ai Hasegawa, I Wanna Deliver a Dolphin, 2011. Exhibition photo from Grow Your Own… Life after Nature, Science Gallery Dublin. Photo credits: Nora S. Vaage. Reproduced with permission from the Science Gallery

References

    1. Andrews LB. Art as a public policy medium. In: Kac E, editor. Signs of life. Bio art and beyond. Cambridge: The MIT Press; 2007. pp. 125–149.
    1. Andrews LB, Abrahamson J. Making art, making policy. In: Caulfield S, Caulfield T, editors. Imagining science: art, science, and social change. Edmonton: The University of Alberta Press; 2008. pp. 1–2.
    1. Aristotle (2009 [ca. 350 B.C.E.]) Poetics (trans: Butcher SH). The internet classics archive. http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/poetics.html. Accessed 04 Apr 2014
    1. Bakke M. Zoe-philic desires: wet media art and beyond. Parallax. 2008;14(3):21–34. doi: 10.1080/13534640802159104. - DOI
    1. Bauman Z. Modernity and the holocaust. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1989.

LinkOut - more resources