Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May 24;114(11):1286-92.
doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.77. Epub 2016 Apr 12.

Cost of care for cancer patients in England: evidence from population-based patient-level data

Mauro Laudicella  1 , Brendan Walsh  1 , Elaine Burns  2 , Peter C Smith  3
Affiliations

Cost of care for cancer patients in England: evidence from population-based patient-level data

Mauro Laudicella et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Health systems are facing the challenge of providing care to an increasing population of patients with cancer. However, evidence on costs is limited due to the lack of large longitudinal databases.

Methods: We matched cost of care data to population-based, patient-level data on cancer patients in England. We conducted a retrospective cohort study including all patients age 18 and over with a diagnosis of colorectal (275 985 patients), breast (359 771), prostate (286 426) and lung cancer (283 940) in England between 2001 and 2010. Incidence costs, prevalence costs, and phase of care costs were estimated separately for patients age 18-64 and ⩾65. Costs of care were compared by patients staging, before and after diagnosis, and with a comparison population without cancer.

Results: Incidence costs in the first year of diagnosis are noticeably higher in patients age 18-64 than age ⩾65 across all examined cancers. A lower stage diagnosis is associated with larger cost savings for colorectal and breast cancer in both age groups. The additional costs of care because of the main four cancers amounts to £1.5 billion in 2010, namely 3.0% of the total cost of hospital care.

Conclusions: Population-based, patient-level data can be used to provide new evidence on the cost of cancer in England. Early diagnosis and cancer prevention have scope for achieving large cost savings for the health system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient average monthly costs: partitioned by survivals.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Basu A, Manning WG (2010) Estimating lifetime or episode-of-illness costs under censoring. Health Econ 19: 1010–1028. - PubMed
    1. Blakely T, Atkinson J, Kvizhinadze G, Wilson N, Davies A, Clarke P (2015) Patterns of cancer care costs in a country with detailed individual data. Med Care 53: 302. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brown ML, Riley GF, Potosky AL, Etzioni RD (1999) Obtaining long-term disease specific costs of care: application to Medicare enrollees diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Med Care 37: 1249–1259. - PubMed
    1. Brown ML, Riley GF, Schussler N, Etzioni R (2002) Estimating health care costs related to cancer treatment from SEER-Medicare data. Med Care 40: IV–104. - PubMed
    1. Coupland VH, Konfortion J, Jack RH, Linklater KM (2011) Data quality and completeness report. Upper gastrointestinal site specific clinical reference group (SSCRG). National Cancer Intelligence Network. Available at: http://goo.gl/mcJ0iO (accessed on 17 March 2016).

Publication types