Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Oct;46(10):1487-501.
doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0532-y.

Validity of the Immediate Post Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT)

Bara Alsalaheen  1 , Kayla Stockdale  2 , Dana Pechumer  2 , Steven P Broglio  3
Affiliations

Validity of the Immediate Post Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT)

Bara Alsalaheen et al. Sports Med. 2016 Oct.

Abstract

Background: The immediate post concussion assessment and cognitive testing (ImPACT) is the most widely used concussion assessment tool. Despite its popularity, it is unclear if validation studies for the ImPACT test covered all aspects of validity to support its widespread use in research and clinical practice.

Objective: The purpose of this report is to review literature surrounding the validity and the utility of the ImPACT test.

Data sources and appraisal: A systematic review of relevant studies in PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO was carried out. Studies were evaluated using the STROBE (strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology) or the STARD (standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy) criteria.

Results: The literature search yielded 5968 studies. Sixty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative review. Although the convergent validity of ImPACT was supported, evidence of discriminant and predictive validity, diagnostic accuracy and responsiveness was inconclusive. The utility of the ImPACT test after acute symptom resolution was sparse. The review found many factors influenced the validity and utility of ImPACT scores.

Conclusion: Clinicians must consider the benefit of ImPACT testing for their patients on a case-by-case scenario and must take the psychometric properties of the test into account when interpreting results.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Dev Neuropsychol. 2015 Jan;40(1):29-33 - PubMed
    1. Brain Inj. 2013;27(1):103-13 - PubMed
    1. J Athl Train. 2014 Sep-Oct;49(5):659-64 - PubMed
    1. Clin J Sport Med. 2012 Mar;22(2):98-104 - PubMed
    1. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Jan 7;138(1):W1-12 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources