Type 2 diabetes and risk of low-energy fractures in postmenopausal women: meta-analysis of observational studies
- PMID: 27072353
- PMCID: PMC5362660
- DOI: 10.1007/s40520-016-0562-1
Type 2 diabetes and risk of low-energy fractures in postmenopausal women: meta-analysis of observational studies
Abstract
Background: Observational studies on osteoporotic fractures in patients with type 2 diabetes indicate their increased incidence compared to those without diabetes, but results are inconsistent. Currently, type 2 diabetes is not considered as an independent risk factor for low-energy fractures in elder subjects. The aim of the study was to assess the association between type 2 diabetes and risk for hip and vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women.
Materials and methods: We searched Medline, Web of Science and Cochrane databases for articles published before September 2013. Studies assessing fractures in women aged >50 diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, regardless of the diabetes treatment, were deemed eligible. To estimate fracture risk meta-analysis in a random effect model was performed. The results were shown by the odds ratio (OR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was tested using a Q-Cochrane test (significance was analyzed with p < 0.10) and I 2 measure.
Results: A total of 15 observational studies (11 cohort and 4 cross-sectional, 263.006 diabetics and 502.115 controls) were included. Thirteen papers provided information on the incidence of hip fractures, and seven on vertebral ones. The meta-analysis revealed type 2 diabetes was associated with higher risk for hip fracture (OR 1.296, 95 % CI (1.069-1.571), but not vertebral fracture (OR = 1.134, 95 % CI (0.936-1.374). There was significant heterogeneity between hip fracture studies. American origin was identified as a potential source of such heterogeneity.
Conclusions: The results of our meta-analysis indicate there is an increased risk for hip fracture in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes.
Keywords: Fracture; Osteoporosis; Type 2 diabetes.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they had no conflict of interest.
Statement of human and animal rights
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent
For this type of study formal consent is not required.
Figures
References
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Statistics Report, 2014. [Internet]. Atlanta, GA; 2014 [cited]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/statsreport14/national-diabetes-report-.... Accessed 28 Aug 2015
-
- International Diabetes Federation. Diabetes Atlas, 2015. [Internet]. Belgium, Brussels. Available from: http://www.diabetesatlas.org/across-the-globe.html. Accessed 23 Mar 2016
-
- Ström O, Borgström F, Kanis JA, et al. Osteoporosis: burden, health care provision and opportunities in the EU: a report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA) Arch Osteoporos. 2011;6:59–155. doi: 10.1007/s11657-011-0060-1. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
