Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Feb;26(2):161-172.
doi: 10.1002/pon.4126. Epub 2016 Apr 12.

Experiences of cervical screening and barriers to participation in the context of an organised programme: a systematic review and thematic synthesis

Affiliations

Experiences of cervical screening and barriers to participation in the context of an organised programme: a systematic review and thematic synthesis

Amanda J Chorley et al. Psychooncology. 2017 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: As uptake of cervical screening continues to decline, this systematic review synthesises the qualitative literature on women's perceptions and experiences of cervical screening in the context of an organised call-recall programme, in order to understand the barriers to informed uptake.

Methods: We searched nine databases for English language peer-reviewed publications reporting on qualitative data from screening-eligible women, exploring barriers to cervical screening in countries that offer a nationally organised call-recall programme. Evidence was integrated using thematic synthesis.

Results: Thirty-nine papers from the UK, Australia, Sweden and Korea were included. The majority of participants had attended screening at least once. Two broad themes were identified: (a) should I go for screening? and (b) screening is a big deal. In considering whether to attend, women discussed the personal relevance and value of screening. Women who had previously attended described how it was a big deal, physically and emotionally, and the varied threats that screening presents. Practical barriers affected whether women translated screening intentions into action.

Conclusions: The variation in women's understanding and perceptions of cervical screening suggests that interventions tailored to decisional stage may be of value in increasing engagement with the invitation and uptake of screening in those who wish to take part. There is also a need for further research with women who have never attended screening, especially those who remain unaware or unengaged, as their perspectives are lacking in the existing literature. © 2016 The Authors. Psycho-Oncology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords: Pap smear; attitudes; cancer; disparities; oncology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relationship between identified themes

References

    1. Peto J, Gilham C, Fletcher O, Matthews FE. The cervical cancer epidemic that screening has prevented in the UK. Lancet 2004;364(9430):249–256. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16674-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Screening and immunisations team, H&SCIC. Cervical Screening Programme, England. Statistics for 2014–15. 2015. http://www.hscic.gov.uk/catalogue/PUB18932/nhs‐cervical‐stat‐eng‐2014‐15... [accessed 12th November 2015].
    1. Moser K, Patnick J, Beral V. Inequalities in reported use of breast and cervical screening in Great Britain: analysis of cross sectional survey data. BMJ 2009;338:b2025 DOI:10.1136/bmj.b2025. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sutton S, Rutherford C. Sociodemographic and attitudinal correlates of cervical screening uptake in a national sample of women in Britain. Soc Sci Med 2005;61(11):2460–2465. DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.07.017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Douglas E, Waller J, Duffy SW, Wardle J. Socioeconomic inequalities in breast and cervical screening coverage in England: are we closing the gap? J Med Screen 2015; Epub ahead of print. doi: 10.1177/0969141315600192. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types