Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr;5(4):116-21.
doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.54.2000628.

The radiographic union scale in tibial (RUST) fractures: Reliability of the outcome measure at an independent centre

Affiliations

The radiographic union scale in tibial (RUST) fractures: Reliability of the outcome measure at an independent centre

J M Leow et al. Bone Joint Res. 2016 Apr.

Abstract

Objectives: The radiographic union score for tibial (RUST) fractures was developed by Whelan et al to assess the healing of tibial fractures following intramedullary nailing. In the current study, the repeatability and reliability of the RUST score was evaluated in an independent centre (a) using the original description, (b) after further interpretation of the description of the score, and (c) with the immediate post-operative radiograph available for comparison.

Methods: A total of 15 radiographs of tibial shaft fractures treated by intramedullary nailing (IM) were scored by three observers using the RUST system. Following discussion on how the criteria of the RUST system should be implemented, 45 sets (i.e. AP and lateral) of radiographs of IM nailed tibial fractures were scored by five observers. Finally, these 45 sets of radiographs were rescored with the baseline post-operative radiograph available for comparison.

Results: The initial intraclass correlation (ICC) on the first 15 sets of radiographs was 0.67 (95% CI 0.63 to 0.71). However, the original description was being interpreted in different ways. After agreeing on the interpretation, the ICC on the second cohort improved to 0.75. The ICC improved even further to 0.79, when the baseline post-operative radiographs were available for comparison.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the RUST scoring system is a reliable and repeatable outcome measure for assessing tibial fracture healing. Further improvement in the reliability of the scoring system can be obtained if the radiographs are compared with the baseline post-operative radiographs.Cite this article: Mr J.M. Leow. The radiographic union scale in tibial (RUST) fractures: Reliability of the outcome measure at an independent centre. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:116-121. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.54.2000628.

Keywords: interobserver reliability; intramedullary fixation; radiographic union; score; tibial fractures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

ICMJE conflict of interest: None declared.

Figures

None
Anteroposterior radiographs a) and b) of the tibia and fibula which show bridging callus, yet fracture lines can still be seen between the original cortices.
None
Diagrams showing a) a fracture with a fracture line and no callus formation; this would be assigned a radiographic union scale in tibial (RUST) fracture score of 1; b) a fracture with callus formation and a fracture line; this is scored as 2; c) a fracture with bridging callus, but the fracture line is still visible across both cortices; this is scored as 3 and d) complete bridging of the callus with no evidence of fracture line and is scored as 3.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Graph showing the percentage of radiographic union scale in tibial (RUST) fractures scores of radiographs
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
This anteroposterior radiograph of the tibia and fibula may seem to have formation of callus around the lateral cortex despite being taken immediately post-operation. The appearance of bridging bone is due to the spiral pattern and slight displacement, where in fact no callus has yet to form.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Anteroposterior radiograph showing the tibia and fibula. It was taken immediately after operation and shows barely visible fracture lines, but no callus.

References

    1. Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Swiontkowski MF, et al. A lack of consensus in the assessment of fracture healing among orthopaedic surgeons. J Orthop Trauma 2002;16:562-566. - PubMed
    1. Kooistra BW, Dijkman BG, Busse JW, et al. The radiographic union scale in tibial fractures: reliability and validity. J Orthop Trauma 2010;24:S81-S86. - PubMed
    1. Whelan DB, Bhandari M, McKee MD, et al. Interobserver and intraobserver variation in the assessment of the healing of tibial fractures after intramedullary fixation. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2002;84-B:15-18. - PubMed
    1. Whelan DB, Bhandari M, Stephen D, et al. Development of the radiographic union score for tibial fractures for the assessment of tibial fracture healing after intramedullary fixation. J Trauma 2010;68:629-632. - PubMed
    1. Panjabi MM, Walter SD, Karuda M, White AA, Lawson JP. Correlations of radiographic analysis of healing fractures with strength: a statistical analysis of experimental osteotomies. J Orthop Res 1985;3:212-218. - PubMed