Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr 13;11(4):e0153601.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153601. eCollection 2016.

Serum CEACAM1 Level Is Associated with Diagnosis and Prognosis in Patients with Osteosarcoma

Affiliations

Serum CEACAM1 Level Is Associated with Diagnosis and Prognosis in Patients with Osteosarcoma

Haiying Yu et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Carcinoembryonic antigen related cell adhesion molecule 1 (CEACAM1) is a trans-membrane multifunctional cell adhesion molecule associated with tumor cell proliferation, apoptosis, angiogenesis, invasion, and migration during tumor development. In the present study, we evaluated serum CEACAM1 level in osteosarcoma patients to explore its diagnostic and prognostic value for this particular malignancy. Sera from 113 patients with primary osteosarcoma, 98 patients with benign bone tumors and 126 healthy controls were obtained. Serum CEACAM1 level was measured with ELISA and correlation with clinicopathological characteristics was further analyzed. Receiver operating curves (ROC), Kaplan-Meier curves, and log-rank analyses as well as Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate diagnostic and prognostic significance. The results revealed that serum CEACAM1 level was significantly higher in osteosarcoma patients compared to benign bone tumors and healthy controls (455.2 ± 179.9 vs 287.4 ± 103.2, 260.8 ± 109.7 pg/ml, respectively). Osteosarcoma patients with larger tumors, later-tumor stages, low tumor grades, and distant metastases had much higher CEACAM1 compared to those with smaller tumors, earlier tumor stages, high tumor grades and non-distant metastases (P < 0.05 for all). Multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed that high serum CEACAM1 level was an independent risk factor for distant metastases (OR = 3.02, 95%CI 1.65-4.17). To distinguish osteosarcoma patients from those with benign bone tumor and healthy controls, ROC/AUC analysis indicated an AUC of 0.81 (sensitivity 0.61; specificity 0.89) and an AUC of 0.77 (sensitivity 0.57; specificity 0.92), respectively. Osteosarcoma patients with higher CEACAM1 had relatively lower survival compared to those with low CEACAM1 (P < 0.01), and multivariate analyses for overall survival revealed that high serum CEACAM1 level was an independent prognostic factor for osteosarcoma (HR = 1.56, 95%CI 1.23-3.28). The present study suggested that elevated serum CEACAM1 level might be a novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for osteosarcoma patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Serum CEACAM1 concentration among OS patients, benign bone tumor and healthy controls.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Correlation analysis between serum CEACAM1 level and OS patients characteristics; Serum CEACAM1 level among OS patients with different tumor size (a); different clinical stages (b); different tumor grades (c); with and without distant metastases (d).
Fig 3
Fig 3. ROC analysis for serum CEACAM1 for distinguishing OS patients from benign bone tumors or healthy controls; ROC for serum CEACAM1 differentiating OS patients from controls (a); from those with benign bone tumors (b); distinguishing OS patients with IIB/III stages from those with IIA stages (c).
Fig 4
Fig 4. Kaplan-Meier survival curves; overall survival for OS patients with high serum CEACAM1 level compared to those with low CEACAM1 (P < 0.01).
Fig 5
Fig 5. CEACAM1 expression level in OS tumor tissue; CEACAM1 mRNA (a) and protein (b) expression of tumor tissues and tumor-adjacent tissues.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jaffe N. Osteosarcoma: review of the past, impact on the future. The American experience. Cancer Treat Res. 2009;152: 239–262. 10.1007/978-1-4419-0284-9_12 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ottaviani G, Jaffe N. The epidemiology of osteosarcoma. Cancer Treat Res. 2009;152: 3–13. 10.1007/978-1-4419-0284-9_1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhang J, Yu XH, Yan YG, Wang C, Wang WJ. PI3K/Akt signaling in osteosarcoma. Clin Chim Acta. 2015;444: 182–192. 10.1016/j.cca.2014.12.041 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Isakoff MS, Bielack SS, Meltzer P, Gorlick R. Osteosarcoma: Current Treatment and a Collaborative Pathway to Success. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33: 3029–3035. 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.4895 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leary SE, Wozniak AW, Billups CA, Wu J, McPherson V, Neel MD, et al. Survival of pediatric patients after relapsed osteosarcoma: the St. Jude Children's Research Hospital experience. Cancer. 2013;119: 2645–2653. 10.1002/cncr.28111 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms