Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr 14:16:321.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2982-4.

Effect of pay for performance to improve quality of maternal and child care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

Affiliations

Effect of pay for performance to improve quality of maternal and child care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

Ashis Das et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Pay for Performance (P4P) mechanisms to health facilities and providers are currently being tested in several low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) to improve maternal and child health (MCH). This paper reviews the existing evidence on the effect of P4P program on quality of MCH care in LMICs.

Methods: A systematic review of literature was conducted according to a registered protocol. MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Embase were searched using the key words maternal care, quality of care, ante natal care, emergency obstetric and neonatal care (EmONC) and child care. Of 4535 records retrieved, only eight papers met the inclusion criteria. Primary outcome of interest was quality of MCH disaggregated into structural quality, process quality and outcomes. Risk of bias across studies was assessed through a customized quality checklist.

Results and discussion: There were four controlled before after intervention studies, three cluster randomized controlled trials and one case control with post-intervention comparison of P4P programs for MCH care in Burundi, Democratic Republic of Congo, Egypt, the Philippines, and Rwanda. There is some evidence of positive effect of P4P only on process quality of MCH. The effect of P4P on delivery, EmONC, post natal care and under-five child care were not evaluated in these studies. There is weak evidence for P4P's positive effect on maternal and neonatal health outcomes and out-of-pocket expenses. P4P program had a few negative effects on structural quality.

Conclusion: P4P is effective to improve process quality of ante natal care. However, further research is needed to understand P4P's impact on MCH and their causal pathways in LMICs.

Trial registration: PROSPERO registration number CRD42014013077 .

Keywords: Low- and middle income countries; Maternal and child health; Pay for performance; Quality of healthcare.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram for selection of articles

References

    1. Musgrove P. Financial and Other Rewards for Good Performance or Results: A Guided Tour of Concepts and Terms and a Short Glossary. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. 2011.https://www.rbfhealth.org/sites/rbf/files/RBFglossarylongrevised_0.pdf. (Accessed 10 Feb 2016).
    1. Soeters R, Habineza C, Peerenboom PB. Performance-based financing and changing the district health system: experience from Rwanda. Bull World Health Organ. 2006;84:884–889. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eichler R. Can “Pay for Performance” Increase Utilization by the Poor and Improve Quality of Health Services. Washington DC: Center for Global Development; 2006.
    1. Witter S, Fretheim A, Kessy FL, Lindahl AK. Paying for performance to improve the delivery of health interventions in low- and middle-income countries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;2:CD007899. - PubMed
    1. Eijkenaar F, Emmert M, Scheppach M, Schöffski O. Effects of pay for performance in health care: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Health Policy. 2013;110:115–130. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.01.008. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources