Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Jun;33(5):401-16.
doi: 10.1007/s10585-016-9791-0. Epub 2016 Apr 13.

Adhesion molecules in peritoneal dissemination: function, prognostic relevance and therapeutic options

Affiliations
Review

Adhesion molecules in peritoneal dissemination: function, prognostic relevance and therapeutic options

Nina Sluiter et al. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2016 Jun.

Abstract

Peritoneal dissemination is diagnosed in 10-25 % of colorectal cancer patients. Selected patients are treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. For these patients, earlier diagnosis, optimised selection criteria and a personalised approach are warranted. Biomarkers could play a crucial role here. However, little is known about possible candidates. Considering tumour cell adhesion as a key step in peritoneal dissemination, we aim to provide an overview of the functional importance of adhesion molecules in peritoneal dissemination and discuss the prognostic, diagnostic and therapeutic options of these candidate biomarkers. A systematic literature search was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. In 132 in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo studies published between 1995 and 2013, we identified twelve possibly relevant adhesion molecules in various cancers that disseminate peritoneally. The most studied molecules in tumour cell adhesion are integrin α2β1, CD44 s and MUC16. Furthermore, L1CAM, EpCAM, MUC1, sLe(x) and Le(x), chemokine receptors, Betaig-H3 and uPAR might be of clinical importance. ICAM1 was found to be less relevant in tumour cell adhesion in the context of peritoneal metastases. Based on currently available data, sLe(a) and MUC16 are the most promising prognostic biomarkers for colorectal peritoneal metastases that may help improve patient selection. Different adhesion molecules appear expressed in haematogenous and transcoelomic spread, indicating two different attachment processes. However, our extensive assessment of available literature reveals that knowledge on metastasis-specific genes and their possible candidates is far from complete.

Keywords: Adhesion; Colorectal cancer; Hipec; Peritoneal metastases; Predictive biomarkers; Prognosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow chart for inclusion of the studies [152]
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
An overview of the essential steps in peritoneal dissemination. The exact molecular mechanisms in tumour cell adhesion to the peritoneum are shown in Fig. 3. Possible therapeutic options focussing on adhesion molecules are shown in Fig. 4
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Adhesive interactions mediating tumour cell adhesion to the peritoneum. a Especially α2β1 expressed on colorectal [46], ovarian [, , –42, 149], gastric [, , –45, 150] and pancreatic [30, 47, 151] cancer cells; b especially CD44 and CD44 s expressed on colorectal [64], ovarian [, , –67, 70, 76, 77, 90], gastric [28, 29, 78] and pancreatic [30] cancer cells; c expressed on colorectal, ovarian and pancreatic cancer cells [95]; d expressed on ovarian cancer cells [–100]; e expressed on ovarian [40, 93, 122, 123] and pancreatic [122] cancer cells; f expressed on ovarian cancer cells [141]; g expressed on ovarian cancer cells [55]; h expressed on ovarian cancer cells [93, 105]
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Most promising therapeutic options in prevention (left) and treatment (right) of peritoneal dissemination: 1 anti-integrin α2β1 antibodies; 2 peptide sequences; 3 anti-CD44 antibodies; 4 hyaluronan bound to cytostatic agents; 5 catumaxomab, a trifunctional antibody with binding sites for EpCAM, T-cells and accessory cells. (Color figure online)

References

    1. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55(2):74–108. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.55.2.74. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bird NC, Mangnall D, Majeed AW. Biology of colorectal liver metastases: a review. J Surg Oncol. 2006;94(1):68–80. doi: 10.1002/jso.20558. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Koppe MJ, Boerman OC, Oyen WJ, Bleichrodt RP. Peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin: incidence and current treatment strategies. Ann Surg. 2006;243(2):212–222. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000197702.46394.16. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jayne DG, Fook S, Loi C, Seow-Choen F. Peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2002;89(12):1545–1550. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02274.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maggiori L, Bretagnol F, Ferron M, Chevalier Y, Panis Y. Laparoscopic colorectal anastomosis using the novel Chex((R)) circular stapler: a case-control study. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13(6):711–715. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02246.x. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms