Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr 14:16:101.
doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0799-4.

Adaptation of the Quality Indicator for Rehabilitative Care (QuIRC) for use in mental health supported accommodation services (QuIRC-SA)

Helen Killaspy  1 , Sarah White  2 , Sarah Dowling  3 , Joanna Krotofil  3 , Peter McPherson  3 , Sima Sandhu  4 , Maurice Arbuthnott  5 , Sarah Curtis  6 , Gerard Leavey  7 , Stefan Priebe  4 , Geoff Shepherd  8 , Michael King  3
Affiliations

Adaptation of the Quality Indicator for Rehabilitative Care (QuIRC) for use in mental health supported accommodation services (QuIRC-SA)

Helen Killaspy et al. BMC Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Background: No standardised tools for assessing the quality of specialist mental health supported accommodation services exist. To address this, we adapted the Quality Indicator for Rehabilitative care-QuIRC-that was originally developed to assess the quality of longer term inpatient and community based mental health facilities. The QuIRC, which is completed by the service manager and gives ratings of seven domains of care, has good psychometric properties.

Methods: Focus groups with staff of the three main types of supported accommodation in the UK (residential care, supported housing and floating outreach services) were carried out to identify potential amendments to the QuIRC. Additional advice was gained from consultation with three expert panels, two of which comprised service users with lived experience of mental health and supported accommodation services. The amended QuIRC (QuIRC-SA) was piloted with a manager of each of the three service types. Item response variance, inter-rater reliability and internal consistency were assessed in a random sample of 52 services. Factorial structure and discriminant validity were assessed in a larger random sample of 87 services.

Results: The QuIRC-SA comprised 143 items of which only 18 items showed a narrow range of response and five items had poor inter-rater reliability. The tool showed good discriminant validity, with supported housing services generally scoring higher than the other two types of supported accommodation on most domains. Exploratory factor analysis showed that the QuIRC-SA items loaded onto the domains to which they had been allocated.

Conclusions: The QuIRC-SA is the first standardised tool for quality assessment of specialist mental health supported accommodation services. Its psychometric properties mean that it has potential for use in research as well as audit and quality improvement programmes. A web based application is being developed to make it more accessible which will produce a printable report for the service manager about the performance of their service, comparison data for similar services and suggestions on how to improve service quality.

Keywords: Mental health; Quality assessment; Standardised tool; Supported accommodation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Wykes T, Dunn G. Cognitive deficit and the prediction of rehabilitation success in a chronic psychiatric group. Psychol Med. 1992;22:389–98. doi: 10.1017/S0033291700030336. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wykes T, Katz R, Sturt E, Hemsley D. Abnormalities of response processing in a chronic psychiatric group. A possible predictor of failure in rehabilitation programmes? Br J Psychiatry. 1992;160:244–52. doi: 10.1192/bjp.160.2.244. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Green MF. What are the functional consequences of neurocognitive deficits in schizophrenia? Am J Psychiatry. 1996;153:321–30. doi: 10.1176/ajp.153.3.321. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Joint Commissioning Panel for Mental Health . Volume 2. Practical Mental Health Commissioning. Guidance for commissioners of rehabilitation services for people with complex mental health needs. London: JCP-MH; 2012.
    1. Priebe S, Saidi M, Want A, Mangalore R, Knapp M. Housing services for people with mental disorders in England: patient characteristics, care provision and costs. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2009;44:805–14. doi: 10.1007/s00127-009-0001-0. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types