Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jul;32(7):1063-9.
doi: 10.1007/s10554-016-0876-2. Epub 2016 Apr 13.

Evaluation of myocardial strain and artery elasticity using speckle tracking echocardiography and high-resolution ultrasound in patients with bicuspid aortic valve

Affiliations

Evaluation of myocardial strain and artery elasticity using speckle tracking echocardiography and high-resolution ultrasound in patients with bicuspid aortic valve

Yang Li et al. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Jul.

Abstract

Reduced artery elasticity and reduced myocardial strain were present in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). Their relation to dilation of proximal aorta is unclear. We aimed to study their relation to dilation of proximal aorta. We studied 57 BAV patients categorized into 2 subgroup according to proximal ascending aortic dimensions (nondilated <35 mm and dilated ≥35 mm). Twenty-nine healthy subjects were recruited as control. Aortic and carotid strain, distensibility and stiffness index were derived. Left ventricular myocardial strain were acquired with speckle-tracking echocardiography. BAV patients with dilation of proximal ascending aorta had lower aortic strain (4.1 ± 4.2 % vs. 7.1 ± 3.5 %) and carotid strain (4.8 ± 1.9 % vs. 10.6 ± 4.2 %), lower aortic distensibility (1.4 ± 1.5 cm(2) dyn(-1) 10(-6) vs. 2.5 ± 1.5 cm(2) dyn(-1) 10(-6)) and carotid distensibility (1.6 ± 0.7 cm(2) dyn(-1) 10(-6) vs. 3.9 ± 2.4 cm(2) dyn(-1) 10(-6)), higher aortic stiffness index (19.7 ± 14.1 vs. 8.3 ± 4.9) and carotid stiffness index (12.2 ± 8.5 vs. 5.0 ± 2.2), and lower global circumferential (-15.9 ± 5.8 % vs. -19.1 ± 4.1 %), radial (19.3 ± 11.6 % vs. 29.8 ± 14.9 %) and longitudinal (-15.7 ± 3.4 % vs. -18.4 ± 3.4 %) compared with those without dilation of proximal ascending aorta. All mean values are different to p < 0.05. Dilation of proximal ascending aorta is associated with more advanced reduction of aortic and carotid elasticity and myocardial strain in BAV patients, supporting the need for detailed and extensive vascular and cardiac surveillance in BAV patients.

Keywords: Artery elasticity; Bicuspid aortic valve; Myocardial strain; Proximal aortic dilation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Int J Cardiol. 2012 Jul 26;158(3):347-52 - PubMed
    1. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 Mar 03;1:7 - PubMed
    1. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Nov;94(47):e2085 - PubMed
    1. Eur Heart J. 2014 Nov 1;35(41):2873-926 - PubMed
    1. Microsc Res Tech. 2001 Nov 15;55(4):259-69 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources