Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr 13;4(2):e35.
doi: 10.2196/mhealth.5120.

Older Adults' Experiences Using a Commercially Available Monitor to Self-Track Their Physical Activity

Siobhan K McMahon  1 , Beth Lewis, Michael Oakes, Weihua Guan, Jean F Wyman, Alexander J Rothman
Affiliations

Older Adults' Experiences Using a Commercially Available Monitor to Self-Track Their Physical Activity

Siobhan K McMahon et al. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. .

Abstract

Background: Physical activity contributes to older adults' autonomy, mobility, and quality of life as they age, yet fewer than 1 in 5 engage in activities as recommended. Many older adults track their exercise using pencil and paper, or their memory. Commercially available physical activity monitors (PAM) have the potential to facilitate these tracking practices and, in turn, physical activity. An assessment of older adults' long-term experiences with PAM is needed to understand this potential.

Objective: To assess short and long-term experiences of adults >70 years old using a PAM (Fitbit One) in terms of acceptance, ease-of-use, and usefulness: domains in the technology acceptance model.

Methods: This prospective study included 95 community-dwelling older adults, all of whom received a PAM as part of randomized controlled trial piloting a fall-reducing physical activity promotion intervention. Ten-item surveys were administered 10 weeks and 8 months after the study started. Survey ratings are described and analyzed over time, and compared by sex, education, and age.

Results: Participants were mostly women (71/95, 75%), 70 to 96 years old, and had some college education (68/95, 72%). Most participants (86/95, 91%) agreed or strongly agreed that the PAM was easy to use, useful, and acceptable both 10 weeks and 8 months after enrolling in the study. Ratings dropped between these time points in all survey domains: ease-of-use (median difference 0.66 points, P=.001); usefulness (median difference 0.16 points, P=.193); and acceptance (median difference 0.17 points, P=.032). Differences in ratings by sex or educational attainment were not statistically significant at either time point. Most participants 80+ years of age (28/37, 76%) agreed or strongly agreed with survey items at long-term follow-up, however their ratings were significantly lower than participants in younger age groups at both time points.

Conclusions: Study results indicate it is feasible for older adults (70-90+ years of age) to use PAMs when self-tracking their physical activity, and provide a basis for developing recommendations to integrate PAMs into promotional efforts.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02433249; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02433249 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6gED6eh0I).

Keywords: Aged; Ambulatory; Mobile Health; Monitoring; Motivation; Physical Activity; Self-Appraisal; Wearables.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Perceived Ease-of-Use of Technology at 10 weeks and 8 months.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Perceived Usefulness of Technology at 10 weeks and 8 months.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Technology Acceptance at 10 weeks and 8 months.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Nelson ME, Rejeski WJ, Blair SN, Duncan PW, Judge JO, King AC, Macera CA, Castaneda-Sceppa C. Physical activity and public health in older adults: recommendation from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Aug;39(8):1435–45. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e3180616aa2.00005768-200708000-00028 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Atlanta, GA. 2015. [2016-03-07]. Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity Data, Trends and Maps http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpao/division-information/data-stats/index.h... .
    1. Patel MS, Asch DA, Volpp KG. Wearable devices as facilitators, not drivers, of health behavior change. JAMA. 2015 Feb 3;313(5):459–60. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.14781.2089651 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Herz J. Wired. [2016-03-01]. Wearables are totally failing the people who need them most http://www.wired.com/2014/11/where-fitness-trackers-fail/ http://www.web... .
    1. Ledger D, McCaffrey D. Endeavour Partners: PAMbridge, MA, USA. [2016-03-01]. Inside wearables: how the science of human behavior change offers the secret to long-term engagement http://endeavourpartners.net/white-papers/ http://www.webcitation.org/6f... .

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources