Early Australian experience in robotic sleeve gastrectomy: a single site series
- PMID: 27080457
- DOI: 10.1111/ans.13545
Early Australian experience in robotic sleeve gastrectomy: a single site series
Abstract
Background: The use of robotic platforms in bariatric surgery has recently gained relevance. With an increased use of this technology come concerns regarding learning curve effects during the initial implementation phase. The sleeve gastrectomy though may represent an ideal training procedure for introducing the robot into bariatric surgical practice. The present review of the first 10 consecutive robotic sleeve gastrectomy procedures performed in an Australian bariatric programme by a single surgeon describes the evolution of the technique, learning curve and initial patient outcomes.
Methods: Between 2014 and 2015, robotic sleeve gastrectomies were performed as primary and revisional procedures by a consistent surgeon-assistant team. Technique evolution and theatre set-up were documented. Patient demographics, operative time (robot docking and total operation time), additional operative procedures performed, operative and post-operative complications at 1, 3 and 6 months post-procedure and weight loss achieved at 6 months were retrospectively reviewed from a prospectively maintained database.
Results: Ten robotic sleeve gastrectomies were performed without significant operative complications. One patient was treated as an outpatient with oral antibiotics for a superficial wound infection. The median total operative time was 123 min (interquartile range (IQR) 108.8-142.5), with a median incision to docking time of 19 min (IQR 15.0-31.8). Length of stay in hospital was 2-3 days. Median excess weight loss achieved at 6 months was 50% (IQR 33.9-66.5).
Conclusion: This study describes a method of safely introducing the da Vinci robot into bariatric surgical practice.
Keywords: bariatric surgery; learning curve; robotic sleeve gastrectomy; robotic surgery; sleeve gastrectomy.
© 2016 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.
Similar articles
-
Laparoscopic hand-assisted versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: experience of 103 consecutive cases.Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016 Jan;12(1):94-9. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.07.011. Epub 2015 Jul 21. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016. PMID: 26507939
-
Robotic-assisted sleeve gastrectomy: an analysis of cost, peri-operative outcomes and learning curve in a prospective cohort study.J Robot Surg. 2025 May 2;19(1):193. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02348-8. J Robot Surg. 2025. PMID: 40316868
-
Robotic sleeve gastrectomy: single-center experience.Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2023;(10):20-28. doi: 10.17116/hirurgia202310120. Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2023. PMID: 37916554 English, Russian.
-
Robotic bariatric surgery: A general review of the current status.Int J Med Robot. 2017 Dec;13(4). doi: 10.1002/rcs.1834. Epub 2017 May 23. Int J Med Robot. 2017. PMID: 28544251 Review.
-
Revisional Robotic Bariatric Surgery. Largest Single Centre Prospective Cohort Study and Review of the Literature.Chirurgia (Bucur). 2023 Oct;118(5):455-463. doi: 10.21614/chirurgia.2023.v.118.i.5.p.455. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2023. PMID: 37965830 Review.
Cited by
-
Robotic bariatric surgery in Australia: early outcomes from a national clinical quality registry with propensity score matched analysis.J Robot Surg. 2025 May 12;19(1):214. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02355-9. J Robot Surg. 2025. PMID: 40353887 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources