A Patient-Centered Framework for Evaluating Digital Maturity of Health Services: A Systematic Review
- PMID: 27080852
- PMCID: PMC4850277
- DOI: 10.2196/jmir.5047
A Patient-Centered Framework for Evaluating Digital Maturity of Health Services: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Background: Digital maturity is the extent to which digital technologies are used as enablers to deliver a high-quality health service. Extensive literature exists about how to assess the components of digital maturity, but it has not been used to design a comprehensive framework for evaluation. Consequently, the measurement systems that do exist are limited to evaluating digital programs within one service or care setting, meaning that digital maturity evaluation is not accounting for the needs of patients across their care pathways.
Objective: The objective of our study was to identify the best methods and metrics for evaluating digital maturity and to create a novel, evidence-based tool for evaluating digital maturity across patient care pathways.
Methods: We systematically reviewed the literature to find the best methods and metrics for evaluating digital maturity. We searched the PubMed database for all papers relevant to digital maturity evaluation. Papers were selected if they provided insight into how to appraise digital systems within the health service and if they indicated the factors that constitute or facilitate digital maturity. Papers were analyzed to identify methodology for evaluating digital maturity and indicators of digitally mature systems. We then used the resulting information about methodology to design an evaluation framework. Following that, the indicators of digital maturity were extracted and grouped into increasing levels of maturity and operationalized as metrics within the evaluation framework.
Results: We identified 28 papers as relevant to evaluating digital maturity, from which we derived 5 themes. The first theme concerned general evaluation methodology for constructing the framework (7 papers). The following 4 themes were the increasing levels of digital maturity: resources and ability (6 papers), usage (7 papers), interoperability (3 papers), and impact (5 papers). The framework includes metrics for each of these levels at each stage of the typical patient care pathway.
Conclusions: The framework uses a patient-centric model that departs from traditional service-specific measurements and allows for novel insights into how digital programs benefit patients across the health system.
Trial registration: N/A.
Keywords: digital maturity; evaluation; health information exchange; patient-centered care.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11532236
-
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016. PMID: 27532314
-
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May;13(22):1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025. PMID: 40417997 Review.
-
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025. PMID: 40548558
-
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27699783 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Digital maturity and its determinants in General Practice: A cross-sectional study in 20 countries.Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 13;10:962924. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.962924. eCollection 2022. Front Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36711349 Free PMC article.
-
Barriers and Facilitators to Accessing Digital Health Tools Faced by South Asian Canadians in Surrey, British Columbia: Community-Based Participatory Action Exploration Using Photovoice.J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 13;24(1):e25863. doi: 10.2196/25863. J Med Internet Res. 2022. PMID: 35023842 Free PMC article.
-
Digital Maturity and Its Measurement of General Practitioners: A Scoping Review.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 28;20(5):4377. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054377. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36901387 Free PMC article.
-
Digital maturity: towards a strategic approach.Br J Gen Pract. 2025 May 2;75(754):200-202. doi: 10.3399/bjgp25X741357. Print 2025 May. Br J Gen Pract. 2025. PMID: 40316331 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Integration of a Digital Health Intervention Into Immunization Clinic Workflows in Kenya: Qualitative, Realist Evaluation of Technology Usability.JMIR Form Res. 2023 Mar 14;7:e39775. doi: 10.2196/39775. JMIR Form Res. 2023. PMID: 36917157 Free PMC article.
References
-
- NHS England . Five Year Forward View Internet. London: 2014. Oct, [2016-03-14]. https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/5yfv-web.pdf .
-
- National Information Board Personalised Health and Care 2020: Using Data and Technology to Transform Outcomes for Patients and Citizens: A Framework for Action. 2014. [2016-03-14]. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/fil... .
-
- Ham C, Curry N. Integrated Care: What Is It? Does It Work? What Does It Mean for the NHS? London, UK: The King's Fund; 2011.
-
- DeLone WH, McLean ER. Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Inf Syst Res. 1992;3:60–95. http://herbsleb.org/SCALEpapers/delone-information-1992.pdf
-
- COACH Canada’s Health Informatics Association Canadian EMR Adoption and Maturity Model: A Multi-Jurisdiction Collaborative and Common EMR Adoption and Maturity Model. 2013. Feb, [2016-03-14]. http://www.coachorg.com/en/resourcecentre/EMR-Adoption-White-Paper.asp .
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical