Bias and reliability in pain ratings
- PMID: 27081835
- DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000448
Bias and reliability in pain ratings
Comment on
-
Pain intensity rating training: results from an exploratory study of the ACTTION PROTECCT system.Pain. 2016 May;157(5):1056-1064. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000502. Pain. 2016. PMID: 27058680 Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Gracely RH, Eliav E. Psychophysics of pain. In: Basbaum AI, Kaneko A, Shepherd GM, Westheimer G, Albright TD, Masland RH, Dallos P, Oertel D, Firestein S, Beaucham GK, Bushnell MC, Kaas JH, Gardner E, editors. The senses: a comprehensive reference, Vol. 5. New York: Academic Press, 2008. pp. 927–59.
-
- Katz J, Melzack R. Pain “memories” in phantom limbs: review and clinical observations. PAIN 1990;43:319–36.
-
- Morley S. Vivid memory for “everyday” pains. PAIN 1993;55:55–62.
-
- Parducci A, Wedell DH. The category effect with rating scales: number of categories, number of stimuli, and method of presentation. J Exper Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1986;12:496–516.
-
- Poulton EC. Quantitative subjective assessments are almost always biased, sometimes completely misleading. Br J Psychol 1977;68:409–25.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical