Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Jul;34(7):326-32.
doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 Apr 12.

Magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer

Affiliations
Review

Magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer

Mark D Tyson et al. Urol Oncol. 2016 Jul.

Abstract

The advent of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has ushered in a new era for urologists who perform prostate needle biopsies. The fusion of MRI with transrectal ultrasound (US) allows the direct targeting of suspicious lesions, which has been shown to improve the performance of conventional random biopsy techniques by increasing detection of clinically relevant disease while also decreasing detection of low-risk cancer. However, as with any new technology, many questions regarding effectiveness, reproducibility, and generalizability still remain. In this review, we (1) provide a summary of the various sequences that comprise a MRI of the prostate; (2) evaluate the 3 different ways of incorporating MRI into targeted biopsies of the prostate including in-bore MRI-guided biopsy, cognitive fusion, and device-mediated fusion; (3) review the sensitivity of MR-US fusion in the detection of clinically significant and clinically insignificant disease; and (4) review the barriers to the widespread implementation of MR-US fusion into everyday practice. Whereas other articles in this issue of Urologic Oncology Seminars will discuss other aspects of MRI in the management of prostate cancer, the purpose of this article is to provide an overview of MR-US fusion biopsies in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Keywords: Fusion; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Prostate Biopsy; Prostate Cancer; Ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
66-year-old male with history of elevated PSA and BPH, status post multiple negative TRUS prostate biopsies and PSA level of 7.46. A 3T prostate MRI without endorectal coil was performed for the purpose of MR-US fusion biopsy. Images show a mildly T2 hypointense lesion in the apex just anterior to the urethra (arrow) which demonstrates markedly increased signal on diffusion weighted image (top right), corresponding darkness on ADC map signifying decreased ADC value (bottom right) and early enhancement on DCE images (asterisk). MR-US fusion biopsied confirmed a Gleason 4+3 lesion.

References

    1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, et al. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase. No. 11 [Internet] Lyon, Fr Int Agency Res Cancer. 2013;11 http://globocan.iarc.f.
    1. Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Terris MK, et al. Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol. 1989;142:71–75. - PubMed
    1. Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Stamey TA. Ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the palpably abnormal prostate. J Urol. 1989;142:66–70. - PubMed
    1. Taira AV, Merrick GS, Galbreath RW, et al. Performance of transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy in detecting prostate cancer in the initial and repeat biopsy setting. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2010;13:71–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cooperberg MR, Broering JM, Kantoff PW, et al. Contemporary trends in low risk prostate cancer: risk assessment and treatment. J Urol. 2007;178:S14–9. - PMC - PubMed