High-Dose Versus Conventional-Dose Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration and Patient and Kidney Survival and Cytokine Removal in Sepsis-Associated Acute Kidney Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- PMID: 27084247
- DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.02.049
High-Dose Versus Conventional-Dose Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration and Patient and Kidney Survival and Cytokine Removal in Sepsis-Associated Acute Kidney Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Background: Soluble inflammatory mediators are known to exacerbate sepsis-induced acute kidney injury (AKI). Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) has been suggested to play a part in immunomodulation by cytokine removal. However, the effect of continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) dose on inflammatory cytokine removal and its influence on patient outcomes are not yet clear.
Study design: Prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label trial.
Setting & participants: Septic patients with AKI receiving CVVHDF for AKI.
Intervention: Conventional (40mL/kg/h) and high (80mL/kg/h) doses of CVVHDF for the duration of CRRT.
Outcomes: Patient and kidney survival at 28 and 90 days, circulating cytokine levels.
Results: 212 patients were randomly assigned into 2 groups. Mean age was 62.1 years, and 138 (65.1%) were men. Mean intervention durations were 5.4 and 6.2 days for the conventional- and high-dose groups, respectively. There were no differences in 28-day mortality (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.73-1.43; P=0.9) or 28-day kidney survival (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.48-1.93; P=0.9) between groups. High-dose CVVHDF, but not the conventional dose, significantly reduced interleukin 6 (IL-6), IL-8, IL-1b, and IL-10 levels. There were no differences in the development of electrolyte disturbances between the conventional- and high-dose groups.
Limitations: Small sample size. Only the predilution CVVHDF method was used and initiation criteria were not controlled.
Conclusions: High CVVHDF dose did not improve patient outcomes despite its significant influence on inflammatory cytokine removal. CRRT-induced immunomodulation may not be sufficient to influence clinical end points.
Keywords: CRRT intensity; CVVHDF dose; Sepsis; acute kidney injury (AKI); continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT); continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF); cytokine removal; immunomodulation; inflammatory cytokines; interleukins; randomized controlled trial; sepsis-induced AKI; systemic inflammatory response syndrome.
Copyright © 2016 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
In Reply to 'Focus Instead on Determining Lower Limit of Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy'.Am J Kidney Dis. 2017 May;69(5):706-707. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.01.038. Epub 2017 Mar 10. Am J Kidney Dis. 2017. PMID: 28291618 No abstract available.
-
Focus Instead on Determining Lower Limit of Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy.Am J Kidney Dis. 2017 May;69(5):706. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.11.030. Epub 2017 Mar 10. Am J Kidney Dis. 2017. PMID: 28291619 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical