Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May 1;95(1):360-367.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.02.021. Epub 2016 Feb 12.

Clinical Outcomes and Patterns of Disease Recurrence After Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Oropharyngeal Squamous Carcinoma

Affiliations

Clinical Outcomes and Patterns of Disease Recurrence After Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Oropharyngeal Squamous Carcinoma

G Brandon Gunn et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. .

Abstract

Purpose: A single-institution prospective study was conducted to assess disease control and toxicity of proton therapy for patients with head and neck cancer.

Methods and materials: Disease control, toxicity, functional outcomes, and patterns of failure for the initial cohort of patients with oropharyngeal squamous carcinoma (OPC) treated with intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) were prospectively collected in 2 registry studies at a single institution. Locoregional failures were analyzed by using deformable image registration.

Results: Fifty patients with OPC treated from March 3, 2011, to July 2014 formed the cohort. Eighty-four percent were male, 50% had never smoked, 98% had stage III/IV disease, 64% received concurrent therapy, and 35% received induction chemotherapy. Forty-four of 45 tumors (98%) tested for p16 were positive. All patients received IMPT (multifield optimization to n=46; single-field optimization to n=4). No Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 4 or 5 toxicities were observed. The most common grade 3 toxicities were acute mucositis in 58% of patients and late dysphagia in 12%. Eleven patients had a gastrostomy (feeding) tube placed during therapy, but none had a feeding tube at last follow-up. At a median follow-up time of 29 months, 5 patients had disease recurrence: local in 1, local and regional in 1, regional in 2, and distant in 1. The 2-year actuarial overall and progression-free survival rates were 94.5% and 88.6%.

Conclusions: The oncologic, toxicity, and functional outcomes after IMPT for OPC are encouraging and provide the basis for ongoing and future clinical studies.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01893307.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Axial and coronal views of two representative treatment plans for base of tongue (A) and tonsil carcinoma (B) patients
Case A: 50-year old male, left base of tongue, T1 Nx(2b). Mean doses (Gy RBE): ipsi parotid 23.4, contra parotid 16.8, ipsi SMG 63.6, contra SMG 34.6, OC 9, larynx 28.3, esophagus 29.5, man 27.4, SPC 54, MPC 59.9, IPC 34.9; Case B: 75-year-old male, left tonsil, T2 N2b. Mean doses (Gy RBE): ipsi parotid 35.1, contra parotid 14.6, ipsi SMG 68.6, contra SMG 27.3, OC 13.4, larynx 29.9, esophagus 11.7, man 18.5, SPC 59.7, MPC 44.8, IPC 27.9 Abbreviations: BS, brainstem; contra, contralateral; CTV, clinical target volume; IPC, inferior pharyngeal constrictor; ipsi, ipsilateral; L, left; man, mandible; MPC, middle pharyngeal constrictor; OC, oral cavity; R, right; SC, spinal cord; SMG, submandibular gland; SPC, superior pharyngeal constrictor; Thyroid G, thyroid gland; WB, whole brain
Figure 2
Figure 2. Actuarial overall and progression free survival

References

    1. Frank SJ, Cox JD, Gillin M, et al. Multifield optimization intensity modulated proton therapy for head and neck tumors: A translation to practice. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;89:846–853. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhu XR, Poenisch F, Li H, et al. A single-field integrated boost treatment planning technique for spot scanning proton therapy. Radiat Oncol Lond Engl. 2014;9:202. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liu W, Frank SJ, Li X, et al. Effectiveness of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy planning for head and neck cancers. Med Phys. 2013;40:051711. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kandula S, Zhu X, Garden AS, et al. Spot-scanning beam proton therapy vs intensity-modulated radiation therapy for ipsilateral head and neck malignancies: A treatment planning comparison. Med Dosim. 2013;38:390–394. - PubMed
    1. Quan EM, Liu W, Wu R, et al. Preliminary evaluation of multifield and single-field optimization for the treatment planning of spot-scanning proton therapy of head and neck cancer. Med Phys. 2013;40 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data