Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Aug;31(8):941-6.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3669-3. Epub 2016 Apr 15.

For the General Internist: A Summary of Key Innovations in Medical Education

Affiliations
Review

For the General Internist: A Summary of Key Innovations in Medical Education

Brita Roy et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Aug.

Abstract

We conducted a review of published medical education articles to identify high-quality research and innovation relevant to educators in general medicine. Our review team consisted of six general internists with expertise in medical education and a professional medical librarian. We manually searched 15 journals in pairs (a total of 3062 citations) for original research articles in medical education published in 2014. Each pair of reviewers independently rated the relevance, importance, and generalizability of articles on medical education in their assigned journals using a 27-point scale (maximum of 9 points for each characteristic). From this list, each team member independently reviewed the 22 articles that received a score of 20 or higher from both initial reviewers, and for each selected article rated the quality and global relevance for the generalist educator. We included the seven top-rated articles for presentation in this review, and categorized the studies into four general themes: continuity clinic scheduling, remediation, interprofessional education, and quality improvement and patient safety. We summarized key findings and identified significant limitations of each study. Further studies assessing patient outcomes are needed to strengthen the literature in medical education. This summary of relevant medical education articles can inform future research, teaching, and practice.

Keywords: medical education; medical education—graduate; medical education—undergraduate; review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding and Support

None

Prior Presentations

This was previously presented as the Update in Medical Education during the Society of General Internal Medicine 38th Annual Meeting on April 23, 2015, in Toronto, ON, CA.

Similar articles

References

    1. Cooke M, Irby DM, O'Brien BC. Educating physicians: a call for reform of medical school and residency. Vol. 16. John Wiley & Sons; 2010.
    1. Shea JA, Arnold L, Mann KV. A RIME perspective on the quality and relevance of current and future medical education research. Acad Med. 2004;79(10):931–938. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200410000-00006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wartman SA. Revisiting the idea of a national center for health professions education research. Acad Med. 2004;79(10):910–917. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200410000-00003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Reed DA, et al. Association between funding and quality of published medical education research. Jama. 2007;298(9):1002–1009. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.9.1002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Reed DA, Beckman TJ, Wright SM. An assessment of the methodologic quality of medical education research studies published in The American Journal of Surgery. Am J Surg. 2009;198(3):442–444. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.01.024. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources