Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May;20(5):600-4.
doi: 10.5588/ijtld.15.0570.

Medium matters: modeling the impact of solid medium performance on tuberculosis trial sample size requirements

Affiliations

Medium matters: modeling the impact of solid medium performance on tuberculosis trial sample size requirements

M G Johnson et al. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2016 May.

Abstract

Setting: Two-month solid medium culture conversion is a commonly used, if suboptimal, endpoint for phase 2 anti-tuberculosis treatment trials.

Objective and design: To model the effect of the performance characteristics (sensitivity and contamination rate) of solid medium on required sample size for a two-arm clinical trial with 85% true (gold standard) culture conversion in the control and 95% in the experimental arm.

Results: Increasing sensitivity and decreasing contamination reduced the sample size from 239 subjects/arm (60% sensitivity, 30% contamination) to 138 subjects/arm (95% sensitivity, 1% contamination).

Conclusion: Optimizing solid medium has significant potential to reduce sample size and increase the efficiency of tuberculosis clinical trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Hypothetical 2-arm study design comparing solid media performance for two-month culture conversion with two sputum specimens between a control arm with 85% “true” culture conversion using solid media to an experimental arm with 95% “true” culture conversion. Probabilities in all nodes are conditional probabilities that sum to 1 given the condition in the attached node to the left. For example, the conditional probabilities of the three nodes to the right of the “15% remain positive” node in the control arm, assuming 20% contamination would equal 0.2 for “1st sputum contaminated”, (0.7 × (1−0.2))=0.56 for “1st sputum positive” if the sensitivity of the medium were 70%, and ((1−0.7) × (1−0.2))=0.24 for “1st sputum negative.” The conditional probabilities (0.2 + 0.56 + 0.24) sum to 1, and the actual probabilities of observing each of these outcomes would be 0.15 multiplied by the conditional probabilities.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of subjects/arm required for hypothetical study design with varying fixed sensitivities and contamination rates for solid media (varying the contamination rate between 1–30% and sensitivity between 60–95%). The top chart displays the number of subjects/arm using solid media with a sensitivity of 60–95% and fixed contamination rates of 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, and 30%, while the bottom chart displays the number of subjects/arm using solid media with a contamination rate of 1–17% and fixed sensitivities of 75%, 85%, 90%, and 95%.

References

    1. Heilig CM, Feng PI, Joloba ML, et al. How we determined the most reliable solid medium for studying treatment of tuberculosis. Tuberculosis. 2014;94:317–322. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Joloba ML, Johnson JL, Feng PI. What is the most reliable solid culture medium for tuberculosis treatment trials. Tuberculosis. 2014;94:311–317. - PubMed
    1. American Thoracic Society (ATS) and CDC Diagnostic standards and classification of tuberculosis in adults and children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;161:1376–1395. - PubMed
    1. Regeade F, Picot N, Blanc-Michaud A, et al. Performance of solid and liquid culture media for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical materials: meta-analysis of recent studies. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;33:867–870. - PubMed
    1. Chihota VN, Grant AD, Fielding K, et al. Liquid vs. solid culture for tuberculosis: performance and cost in a resource-constrained setting. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2010;14:1024–1031. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources