Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jun;3(6):535-43.
doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)00103-6. Epub 2016 Apr 13.

Prediction of violent reoffending on release from prison: derivation and external validation of a scalable tool

Affiliations

Prediction of violent reoffending on release from prison: derivation and external validation of a scalable tool

Seena Fazel et al. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 Jun.

Abstract

Background: More than 30 million people are released from prison worldwide every year, who include a group at high risk of perpetrating interpersonal violence. Because there is considerable inconsistency and inefficiency in identifying those who would benefit from interventions to reduce this risk, we developed and validated a clinical prediction rule to determine the risk of violent offending in released prisoners.

Methods: We did a cohort study of a population of released prisoners in Sweden. Through linkage of population-based registers, we developed predictive models for violent reoffending for the cohort. First, we developed a derivation model to determine the strength of prespecified, routinely obtained criminal history, sociodemographic, and clinical risk factors using multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression, and then tested them in an external validation. We measured discrimination and calibration for prediction of our primary outcome of violent reoffending at 1 and 2 years using cutoffs of 10% for 1-year risk and 20% for 2-year risk.

Findings: We identified a cohort of 47 326 prisoners released in Sweden between 2001 and 2009, with 11 263 incidents of violent reoffending during this period. We developed a 14-item derivation model to predict violent reoffending and tested it in an external validation (assigning 37 100 individuals to the derivation sample and 10 226 to the validation sample). The model showed good measures of discrimination (Harrell's c-index 0·74) and calibration. For risk of violent reoffending at 1 year, sensitivity was 76% (95% CI 73-79) and specificity was 61% (95% CI 60-62). Positive and negative predictive values were 21% (95% CI 19-22) and 95% (95% CI 94-96), respectively. At 2 years, sensitivity was 67% (95% CI 64-69) and specificity was 70% (95% CI 69-72). Positive and negative predictive values were 37% (95% CI 35-39) and 89% (95% CI 88-90), respectively. Of individuals with a predicted risk of violent reoffending of 50% or more, 88% had drug and alcohol use disorders. We used the model to generate a simple, web-based, risk calculator (OxRec) that is free to use.

Interpretation: We have developed a prediction model in a Swedish prison population that can assist with decision making on release by identifying those who are at low risk of future violent offending, and those at high risk of violent reoffending who might benefit from drug and alcohol treatment. Further assessments in other populations and countries are needed.

Funding: Wellcome Trust, the Swedish Research Council, and the Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests

NL is the national scientific adviser for Research and Evaluation for the Swedish Prison and Probation Service. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Estimated probability of violent reoffending in released prisoners in Sweden
Figure 2
Figure 2. Model discrimination shown by receiver operating characteristics curves
The arrow indicates the point corresponding to the risk threshold. Sens=sensitivity. Spec=specificity. PPV=positive predictive value. NPV=negative predictive value. AUC=area under curve.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Model calibration by levels of predicted risk
Data are from the external validation. Error bars represent 95% CIs. Numbers are the number of individuals in each risk category.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Proportion of released prisoners who violently reoffend by risk group
Data are from derivation and validation samples.

Comment in

References

    1. Chandler RK, Fletcher BW, Volkow ND. Treating drug abuse and addiction in the criminal justice system: improving public health and safety. JAMA. 2009;301:183–90. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fazel S, Wolf A. A systematic review of criminal recidivism rates worldwide: current difficulties and recommendations for best practice. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0130390. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ministry of Justice. [accessed June 12, 2015];Compendium of reoffending statistics and analysis 2012. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/compendium-of-reoffending-sta...
    1. Schmitt J, Warner K. Ex-offenders and the labor market. Washington DC: Center for Economic and Policy Research; 2010.
    1. Petersilia J. Beyond the prison bubble. Fed Probation. 2011;75:2.

LinkOut - more resources