Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr 18:16:80.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0870-7.

Women and their birth partners' experiences following a primary postpartum haemorrhage: a qualitative study

T Dunning  1 , J M Harris  2 , J Sandall  3
Affiliations

Women and their birth partners' experiences following a primary postpartum haemorrhage: a qualitative study

T Dunning et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is a common obstetric complication. Rates of PPH are increasing in a number of developed countries. This is concerning as PPH is recognised as a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality which includes psychological and emotional distress. There is limited understanding of the emotional impact of PPH experienced by women and their birth partners. This study qualitatively describes the experiences of women and their birth partners who experienced a primary PPH.

Methods: Semi-structured interview study. Couples were recruited via maximum variation sampling, which, by purposive sampling drew participants from three groups depending on the degree of PPH: minor (500-1000 ml), moderate (1000-2000 ml) and severe (>2000 ml). Interviews took place from 4 to 14 months post birth, and data were analysed via Framework analysis.

Results: In this qualitative study, 11 women and six partners were interviewed. Data were organised into four interrelated themes; Control, Communication, Consequence, Competence. Just over half of the women and their birth partners were unaware they had a PPH, and would have preferred more information either at the time or in the postnatal period. The findings suggest that birth partners also required more information, especially if separated from their partner during the PPH.

Conclusions: This study provides valuable insights into women's reports of their feelings and experiences during and after a PPH, and how their partners feel having observed a PPH. This study suggests that women who have had a PPH of any volume would like more information. Further investigations into the timings, methods and effectiveness of discussions following a PPH are recommended.

Keywords: Birth partners; Birth trauma; Childbirth; Obstetric emergency; Post-traumatic stress disorder; Postpartum haemorrhage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Key themes emerging in interviews
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Care Quality Commission. Care Quality Commission . Investigation Report: University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust. London: Care Quality Commission; 2011.
    1. Francis R. Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry: Executive Summary. London: The Stationary Office; 2013.
    1. Magee H, Askham H. Women’s views about safety in maternity care. A qualitative study. London: King’s Fund; 2008.
    1. Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecologists (RCOG) Green-top guideline No 52: Prevention and Management of Post Partum Haemorrhage. London: RCOG; 2009.
    1. Rance S, McCourt C, Rayment J, Mackintosh N, Carter W, Watson K, Sandall J. Women’s safety alerts in maternity care: Is speaking up enough? BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22:348–355. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001295. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types