Efficacy and safety of frozen-thawed embryo transfer in women aged 35 to 42 years from the PURSUE randomized clinical trial
- PMID: 27090863
- DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.041
Efficacy and safety of frozen-thawed embryo transfer in women aged 35 to 42 years from the PURSUE randomized clinical trial
Abstract
Objective: To examine the efficacy and safety of frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FTET) cycles with supernumerary embryos cryopreserved during a randomized clinical trial (PURSUE).
Design: Follow-up clinical study.
Setting: In vitro fertilization (IVF) centers.
Patient(s): Infertile women 35 to 42 years of age.
Intervention(s): In PURSUE, women were randomized to a single injection of 150 μg of corifollitropin alfa (n = 694) or daily 300 IU of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (recombinant FSH; n = 696) for the first 7 days of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) in a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol.
Main outcome measure(s): Cumulative vital pregnancy rate per-patient by treatment group, cumulative live-birth rate per-patient by treatment group, and occurrence of adverse events in (pregnant) women and their fetuses/infants and the incidence of congenital malformations in the infants.
Result(s): Of the 1,390 treated women in PURSUE, 307 were enrolled in the FTET study. In PURSUE or a subsequent FTET cycle, the cumulative vital pregnancy rate (per patient) was 31.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 27.7%; 34.7%) with corifollitropin alfa versus 33.0% (95% CI: 29.6%; 36.7%) with recombinant FSH; treatment difference, -1.8% (95% CI, -6.5%; 3.0%), and the cumulative live-birth rate (per patient) was 28.2% (95% CI, 24.9%; 31.8%) with corifollitropin alfa versus 29.5% (95% CI, 26.1%; 33.0%) with recombinant FSH; treatment difference, -1.2% (95% CI, -5.7%; 3.4%). There were no clinically relevant differences in safety outcomes collected from pregnant women or their infants after transfer of cryopreserved embryos obtained by treatment with corifollitropin alfa or recombinant FSH.
Conclusion(s): The cumulative vital pregnancy and live-birth rates (from fresh cycles and FTET) were similar in women treated with corifollitropin alfa and recombinant FSH. No new safety signals were detected in this follow-up FTET study.
Clinical trial registration number: NCT01146418.
Keywords: Assisted reproductive technology; GnRH antagonist; corifollitropin alfa; frozen-thawed embryo transfer; rFSH.
Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Large, comparative, randomized double-blind trial confirming noninferiority of pregnancy rates for corifollitropin alfa compared with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist controlled ovarian stimulation protocol in older patients undergoing in vitro fertilization.Fertil Steril. 2015 Jul;104(1):94-103.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.04.018. Epub 2015 May 21. Fertil Steril. 2015. PMID: 26003273 Clinical Trial.
-
Corifollitropin alfa followed by highly purified HMG versus recombinant FSH in young poor ovarian responders: a multicentre randomized controlled clinical trial.Hum Reprod. 2017 Nov 1;32(11):2225-2233. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex296. Hum Reprod. 2017. PMID: 29040589 Clinical Trial.
-
High ovarian response does not jeopardize ongoing pregnancy rates and increases cumulative pregnancy rates in a GnRH-antagonist protocol.Hum Reprod. 2013 Feb;28(2):442-52. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des389. Epub 2012 Nov 7. Hum Reprod. 2013. PMID: 23136144
-
Is there a place for corifollitropin alfa in IVF/ICSI cycles? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Fertil Steril. 2012 Apr;97(4):876-85. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.01.092. Epub 2012 Jan 23. Fertil Steril. 2012. PMID: 22277766
-
Corifollitropin alfa: a review of its use in controlled ovarian stimulation for assisted reproduction.BioDrugs. 2011 Aug 1;25(4):243-54. doi: 10.2165/11206890-000000000-00000. BioDrugs. 2011. PMID: 21815699 Review.
Cited by
-
A randomized controlled trial of AMH-based individualized FSH dosing in a GnRH antagonist protocol for IVF.Hum Reprod Open. 2019 Feb 27;2019(1):hoz003. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoz003. eCollection 2019. Hum Reprod Open. 2019. PMID: 30895268 Free PMC article.
-
Endometrial preparation for women undergoing embryo transfer with frozen embryos or embryos derived from donor oocytes.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 28;10(10):CD006359. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006359.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 33112418 Free PMC article.
-
Fresh versus frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduction.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 28;3(3):CD011184. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011184.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 4;2:CD011184. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011184.pub3. PMID: 28349510 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
The effect of fresh IVF cycle characteristics on frozen embryo transfer (FET) outcomes.JBRA Assist Reprod. 2020 May 1;24(2):135-142. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20190074. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2020. PMID: 32072802 Free PMC article.
-
Fresh versus frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduction.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 4;2(2):CD011184. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011184.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 33539543 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical